Contractor Talk - Professional Construction and Remodeling Forum banner

Estimating Software

34K views 20 replies 13 participants last post by  480sparky  
#1 · (Edited)
I am looking at cut/fill take off software. Is anyone using Earthworks by Solution Technologies Inc. It is affordable and seems to do what I need.
 
#2 ·
I use an older version of Earthworks. My digitizer just crapped the bed so I either have to get another one or i've been thinking about getting software that will let me do onscreen takeoffs. Too many choices, hate to make the wrong purchase because of the cost. Can anyone make any recomendations? Cuts/Fills very important.

Alan
 
#3 ·
I've never used Earthworks by Solution Technologies but I used Earthwork by Trakware for years until we upgraded our GPS software to include Trimble HCE with the estimating module. Earthworks (by trakware) works well for the price, which is cheap compared to Agtek or HCE. For Smaller projects it does the job just fine but lacks the bells and whistles that come in handy when doing takeoffs for the larger projects. Earthworks also has an onscreen takeoff capability so you don't need a digitizer, which are quickly becoming archaic since most good programs offer the onscreen capabilities these days.

If you have the money for Cadillacs I'd go with Agtek or Trimble HCE. But like I said I used Earthworks by Trakware and it did the job. http://www.trakwareusa.com/Earthworks.htm
 
#5 ·
For smaller projects I use Planswift, it's affordable and you can customize it fit nearly any need. I also do take offs for another company in our office that builds houses and condos. I have found it to be a very powerful tool...... The one downside to planswift is the customer support, they use to have fantastic customer support but they grew to big to quickly and now cannot provide the service I feel is required.
 
#7 ·
Sorry for the delay in posting to this thread. AGTEK's earthwork takeoff and modeling software does have "Cadillac" pricing but you can buy just the modules you actually need (site grading, roads, utilities, staking/grade control, haul tracking/production analysis, etc.) ... a lower-priced alternative would be to watch for used AGTEK systems (search on "Agtek" at http://www.ebay.com), but used AGTEK systems are snapped up pretty quickly. For more information about AGTEK software, see the video demonstrations available on AGTEK's website at http://www.agtek.com and join/follow the independent AGTEK User Group on LinkedIn at http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2015287.
 
#12 ·
Thanks for the follow up dayexco and TLP. Nobody in this thread asked a technical question about using AGTEK software ... had they, I would have freely answered (as I have done, and continue to do, in other web forums--most frequently over at LinkedIn's AGTEK User Group, which I did reference in my original post). I posted a link to AGTEK's website in this thread because AGTEK had already been mentioned but no corresponding link to AGTEK's site had been provided. None of the links I provided were to my own website (I don't sell AGTEK software). Let me be clear: I receive no form of compensation from AGTEK (salary, commission, finder's fees, kick backs, bribes, or otherwise!). I hope that clarifies things and, by all means, if anyone has a specific technical question about some AGTEK function, feel free to post it and I will reply.
 
#13 · (Edited)
How about you demo one of your current projects for us like I did on this estimating software thread called xactimate below I purchased asking the same sort of questions as the op?

http://www.contractortalk.com/f15/aerial-roof-measuring-software-136335/

On this thread I give an overview of the aerial roof estimating(from images) workbench, take and post screen dumps along the way, and of course answer any questions, list the pros and cons.

I picked the software up in about 40 hours, they offer paid training but I was able to figure it out from goggling, utube, etc. These days you have to be a fool to pay for training, there are so many free online resources. Also, these guys have free live chat and I have even helped identify the current version release problems, so imo it is important to get free online support when choosing a software. I wish the 3d modeling tools were better, and the rendering, as an example of cons you could tell us about.

Don't hold back, feel free to fill us in on all the details as I did in my thread. :clap: I even posted some pics of some very complex aircraft parts I designed, but I'll hold back on my over 30 years of engineering experience just for you, lol! ;)
 
#14 ·
TLP,

Although I am more than willing to answer any specific AGTEK technical question on this forum, I must admit that I have neither the time nor the inclination to produce and publish a comprehensive online AGTEK software training course for this, or for any other, public domain venue. That's not to say that I have not invested (and don't continue to invest) many hundreds of personal man-hours in producing meticulously detailed technical training manuals for various AGTEK earthwork software applications (that is, after all, much of what I do with my working time); it's simply a statement that I will not dump what I consider to be "intellectual property" into the public domain. Your comment "These days you have to be a fool to pay for training" reveals a wide and deep philosophical division between us and "you get what you pay for" is my first responsive thought (although my daughter could teach herself how to read music, play piano, and sing via reading free online articles and watching free YouTube videos, I foolishly pay for her piano and voice training).

These exchanges have diverted this thread far from its original topic, to which I would actually like to return. There are multiple cut/fill takeoff software products, on a range of price points (surprisingly, none are free), in the market. Will the lowest-priced "Yugo" product meet every earthwork estimator's needs? No! Does every earthwork estimator need a high-priced "Cadillac" product? No! However, I do think the minimum requirements must include the following capabilities: (1) model the existing site surface, (2) allow an adjustment for stripping the existing site surface, (3) model the final design surface, (4) allow an adjustment for engineered material thicknesses associated with the final design surface, (5) allow an adjustment for shrink/swell, and (6) calculate and report the cut/fill volumes.

If you recognize and understand the importance of the above minimum software requirements, then you will most likely also understand that a specific earthwork estimate can require far more analysis than the minimum software capabilities will easily accommodate (horizontal subtotal and phasing areas, differential subsurface existing materials, intermediate and/or corrective grading, etc.). Other cut/fill software variables to consider would include data-entry options (manual digitizing from paper and raster digital plans vs. importing vector data files), visualization and error-checking tools (3D views, profile views, cut/fill maps, contouring, Google Earth interface, etc.), editing options (error correction), output options (paper only vs. digital files for transfer to CAD, survey, machine control systems). Differences in all these options are what define the "Yugo" and "Cadillac" cut/fill takeoff software products and you will get exactly what you pay for.

For those interested in a far more detailed discussion on the subject of cut/fill takeoff software requirements (and for those who don't mind reading a dry 35-page footnoted academic paper) feel free to download a PDF copy of "Digital Surface Modeling and Volumetric Analysis Techniques Applied to the Measurement of Plan-View Earthwork Quantities" at http://www.earthworksoftwareservices.com/downloads/whitepaper.pdf. Although it's dated (I wrote it 20 years ago, when the only practical data-entry option was manual digitizing from paper plans), it includes an overview of various manual earthwork takeoff methods and requisite adjustments, a detailed discussion of digital surface interpolation methods (grid vs. TIN), and a detailed discussion of volume calculation methods using digital surface models.

The paper referenced in the paragraph above does not provide any specific information on AGTEK software; for that, I suggest a good starting point would be to view the short online video demonstrations available on AGTEK's website per my original post in this thread.