Contractor Talk - Professional Construction and Remodeling Forum banner
1 - 3 of 5 Posts

· Registered
23 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
PipeGuy said:
You should take a real hard look at what you hope to accomplish by requiring subs to provide bonds. Bonds may not be the best instrument to achieve the outcome you desire.
A bond will not provide you a quick fix in circumstances where non-performance is an issue. They may not help at all if your subcontract agreement has holes in it. Your best protection against non-performance issues is selecting reliable subs and using tight subcontact agreements.
Remember, if you are competing against others who do not require bonds you are automatically at a competitive disadantage in terms of your cost. This cost may include not only the bond's cost plus mark-up but the cost of whatever additional risk the sub perceives in performing bonded work vs. non-bonded.
Thanks that helps alot
1 - 3 of 5 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.