I use Chief Architect software for doing plans, and there has been a lot of discussion at the Chief users forum about how the software does not address staircase 3D rendering and 2D drawing as well as it is needed.
Chief Architect's 2D drafting capabilities are about equal to anything out there, so that the hard working designer or architect can detail out anything imaginable. That is not the issue. The complaint seems to center around the tools that are there to model the stuff in 3D.
I take the opposite view of those that say we need better tools for 3D, and it is because I am (guessing, actually) that much of the staircase building that takes place nowadays in big-ticket work, gets done with the architectural plans only showing some basics, and then the stairbuilder's art and capabilities take it from there.
So, tell me, if you are into doing expensive staircase work, what do the builder's plans show you? How interested are you in seeing that a 3D rendering shows things exactly as they are to be?
Chief Architect's 2D drafting capabilities are about equal to anything out there, so that the hard working designer or architect can detail out anything imaginable. That is not the issue. The complaint seems to center around the tools that are there to model the stuff in 3D.
I take the opposite view of those that say we need better tools for 3D, and it is because I am (guessing, actually) that much of the staircase building that takes place nowadays in big-ticket work, gets done with the architectural plans only showing some basics, and then the stairbuilder's art and capabilities take it from there.
So, tell me, if you are into doing expensive staircase work, what do the builder's plans show you? How interested are you in seeing that a 3D rendering shows things exactly as they are to be?