Joined
·
7 Posts
I had the roof replaced on my house & rental cottage in Florida by a local contractor with out of state sub-contractors. The contract stipulated that I was to be given notice a week in advance so that I could be present for the tear-off because I was concerned about the decking on my 76 year old house. After both houses were completed, I was notified by my neighbor that the roofs looked good and this was back in April. I paid them half the money and the balance of $6,000 is outstanding. Both chimneys had their flashing hacked up(original copper) to install deck flashing. All but one of the valleys never had the flashing replace which I made them do over(I went on an errand when this was happening so when I got back they had removed all the original copper valley flashing) and one part of the roof has never layed flat due to decking issues. I have also had them come back and replace the drip edge where it is all crinkled up but they still need to do more due to inferior craftmenship. Also the courses are not straight but at this point I can live with that even though I find this to be annoying. The roof doesn't leak so that is a plus given the nightmares that others have gone through in this area with out of state contractors who are now out of state.
Anyway, here is my question: How should I end this nightmare and it is mostly concerning the decking. I feel that the decking should be replaced but refuse to pay at this point to have the roof replaced in questionable areas because this should have been done from the beginning as an extra cost which I was willing to pay. Of course without me being there for the tear-off makes the whole thing even more maddening. Any and all thoughts would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Tom
Anyway, here is my question: How should I end this nightmare and it is mostly concerning the decking. I feel that the decking should be replaced but refuse to pay at this point to have the roof replaced in questionable areas because this should have been done from the beginning as an extra cost which I was willing to pay. Of course without me being there for the tear-off makes the whole thing even more maddening. Any and all thoughts would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Tom