dbrons, That is nice, Don't ever question authority, keep your head down and go with the herd when they are loading the cattle cars...
BP fine, thanks for asking.
I don't care what everyone else is doing unless they expect me to comply with a silly idea, such as laying CMUs with out enough mortar to from a mechanical bond between units. I do clean out the grout cells to the statisfaction of the inspector, but my ungrouted cells have mortar fingers. Any one who has demoed a wall with bed joints that aren't extruded into the cells knows they are weaker, easier to unbond, and much easier to displace, in more severe examples one can knock units out of the wall sideways with out any great effort.
Concrete Masonry, I respect your opinions here and on other forums.
I might not made myself clear, With 50 diameter laps, # 5 bars are lapped ~65% of length vertically with 4 ft grout lifts, any horizontal bond beam crossing them creates congestion that even a tiny bit of dead mortar worsens, add a 90 degree corner bar for a sesmic/hurricane window detail, you 've something very hard to insure grout is flowing downward to fill all the voids below.
If I'm the decider, we grout at every horizontal beam...
I try to get my grout to test as close as possible to the CMUs strength, the higher the test, the shorter the laps needed for the iron, the cheaper the wall is to construct, saving labor and materials.
I mastered the slump part about 25 years ago... Pea rock should flow, except when it doesn't... Aligning the webs, that was the week after the slump lesson.:surrender:
#2. Again you are preaching to the choir brother, If I'm getting paid. its done right.
I understand that particularly in high rise construction, no unreinforced cells should be filled, the surplus weight alone could rapidly consume safety margins of lower load path components. Some times more isn't better.
I humblely submit your opinion about CMUs produced without the tops being slightly larger than the bottom as having no effect as false, Test a panel with all the units laid upside down... The wider top allows the mortar to make legos instead of remaining Jenga style smooth units. Any one who has laid "Menards" straight sided CMUs knows by lunchtime the 8 oz of material used to produce the "handles" is money well spent.
H block are lovely,just about eliminates congestion, now if they could figure out the corners... I'd like to see 24" long lightweights with the Army (H) style webs, similar to the haydites 24" scored CMUs used out East. Additionally three web block are much easier to one hand than the "Army" H block. That considerably cuts the weight advantage of the two web blocks.
Having had the priviledge of working on a Super Target that had bastard walls with a mix of 3 and 2 web block where different color Rock face blocks were used, H block still have some unresolved issues...
The now old school "engineered" CMUs were a giant step up from the old old school 3 holers..
Sorry about the rant about ASTM standards being preverted by biased panel members--any suggestions to evolve them to more rational rules?
Kickler, Every print and spec I read will say,..."Contractor is required to meet all applicable laws, regulations, statutes, zoning,....etc.." It is on you to find out if the specs meet the codes for this location, use and TIME.