Contractor Talk - Professional Construction and Remodeling Forum banner

Jack stud sizing for large header span

1 reading
3.2K views 45 replies 14 participants last post by  TCBG  
#1 ·
I am building a house in Southern California where there is a sliding glass door on the first floor, with a second story above. The Header spans 13ft and is a Parałam PSL 3 1/2”x 11 7/8. All Lumber on this project is Select Structural Douglas Fir. My framer was supposed to use 3 2x4s as the Jack Studs, but chose to use a single 4x6 as the jack stud on each side. This is a 2x4 wall, so the 4x6 is sideways. Is this an acceptable way of framing out a header? I have never seen it done this way, are there any drawbacks to this design?
 
#6 ·
Hey Mike,

There are no top plates above the header, the floor joists sit on the Parałam Beam. The Header is connected to the top plates next to it with a Simpson MSTC28 strap. The Header is also connected with A35s to the rim joist, and it is connected to the 4x6 post with a simpson HRS416Z. The 4x6 is connected to the bottom plate and king stud with a LTP4 plates. There are 2 king studs that are both nailed together, as well as screwed with SDWS screws both into the post and into the header.
 
#8 ·
I think they are built up typically because 2x’s are what’s on the job. I’ve definitely been on framing projects where 4x4’s and 4x6’s were used with the wall framing. Inspectors in my part of California like to see the Simpson connectors more and more these past years. Being in the wall I wouldn’t fret the twisting as much as if exposed or PT. But I definitely understand your concern and do prefer built up with cross grain strength. I’m sure you know if the grain look is different at one end vs the other, it’s likely to twist up.
 
#11 ·
Hey Wąskin, we definitely went above and beyond on Simpson to please the inspector. The way I was taught when ordering anything 4x or larger, it should always be spec’s at FOHC & quarter sawn, to minimize twisting, & warping. I always recommend to the customer that all 2x used for load bearing walls and floor joists be ordered #1 or better KDHT. Great tip on checking the grain. I’m only concerned on this specific trimmer because it’s a 16k door, otherwise I wouldn’t be worried about it.
 
#13 ·
That is exactly where I’m at, you hit it on the head. The cost now would be insignificant compared to the cost later, but I also don’t want to waste time and money if it is acceptable and doesn’t pose a risk. Not to mention if I swap it out with 3 2x4s there is now a 1” gap to deal with. I was thinking about using 2 2x4s and 1 3x4 to make up the difference, or just adding a 1” piece of ply to the 3 2x4s, but it would be ideal if I didn’t have to worry about it.
 
#36 ·
Mike is correct that PT Doug fir is is weaker, and is not actually rated as structural, not to mention that the moisture content is much higher in pressure treated lumber than regular framing lumber. I have built Decks before with Appearance grade KDAT DF that did not have perforations, but that was only because the customer requested that, and it was 3 times the price of regular DF. You can also request regular pressure treated DF that is non incised, but the treatment doesn’t get nearly as deep into the wood. I would never use pressure treated wood inside a wall cavity for anything but the mud sill
 
#37 ·
I want to thank everybody for all the great advice, I did end up replacing the 4 x 6 trimmers with 3 1/2” x 5 1/4” Parałam PSL columns, and it turned out nice. In most cases, I would have left it and just called it a day but considering the door is about 17 K I didn’t want to be the reason they had issues in the future. They paid for the materials and it didn’t even take an hour to replace, so it worked out in the end.