|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Tower Guy
Trade: General Remodeling
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 165
|
Which Building Is Better?
Just curious to see what you guys think makes a better green building. Is it more important to use recycled materials and use the minimum amount of materials needed?
Or is it more important to build something that will last as long as possible so that the energy/resources are only used once over a long period of time? I know you can have the best of both, just wondering which you see as a better way to make a home or building green. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Pro
Trade: paint contractor since 1974
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: IL. 60 miles SW of Chicago
Posts: 348
|
Re: Which Building Is Better?
The second is the only real chose. Green is only going to make it if the value is there. After the hype people will quickly turn away if they don't feel good about their investment long term. Both would be great but don't give up quality.
Jim Bunton |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
It's all about the Avatar
Trade: I have no face!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,798
|
Re: Which Building Is Better?
As with all choices, the best choice is the one we make at that moment. That is how we learn from our mistakes. Building homes of stone in an earth quake zone gives me pause, and a house of glass on a busy freeway is just asking for the occasional stone or two.
Building something the conserves energy and is from a renewable resource, what the heck can't hurt can it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Tower Guy
Trade: General Remodeling
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 165
|
Re: Which Building Is Better?
The reason I posed the question is because building green is about building responsibly. I personally feel that some of the "green" homes I've seen are built like matchstick houses, and while energy effecient and low impact environmentally, if they don't last 100 years, are they worth it? I feel there is a balance between overkill and effeciency that would optimize a house meant to be green. It would require more resources to construct, but would last so long, that no more resources would be needed down the road.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Insert title
Trade: Doors-Windows-Decks
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: MA&RI
Posts: 4,677
|
Re: Which Building Is Better?
MK, I would pick a long lasting material over an easy to produce material. For example the new steel shingles over straw. I need to look into bamboo a little more it is getting 2 thumbs up.
__________________
To get the best replacement windows, or sun rooms contact the replacement windows experts at FHI Vinyl Window Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
It's all about the Avatar
Trade: I have no face!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,798
|
Re: Which Building Is Better?Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
LC Australia
Trade: Building
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 439
|
Re: Which Building Is Better?
like mkamis mentioned, " energy efficient and low impacting the environment". Basically building a home that requires a low input of enviromental forces. And a low ouput of horrible emmisions.
__________________
"It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees" |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fence Building School | eddymn | Decks & Fencing | 15 | 08-22-2011 11:13 PM |
| Need help with a shocking outside waterspout | Badoish | Electrical | 23 | 12-27-2008 04:18 PM |
| How to estimate for a building project | Yacob | Business | 19 | 05-12-2007 12:50 PM |
| Deck building as a career? | fishscaper | Decks & Fencing | 13 | 03-20-2007 10:08 PM |
| Go to Page... |
