|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Trade: plumbing
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Posts: 60
|
Accessable Vs Readly Accessable
Had a discussion with a plumbing inspector the other day in regards to accessable Vs readly accessable. The code definition is; Accessible- When applied to a fixture, connection, appliance or equipment, "accessible" means having access thereto, but which may first require the removal of an access panel, door or similar obstruction. "Readily accesible" means direct access without the necessity of removing any panel, door, or similar obstruction.
I had an indirect funnel drain behind an access panel, he stated that it was not readily accessable, my feeling is that is was readlly accessible as the panel is hinged and removeing it is not necessary to gain access to. What do you think? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Pro Plumber
Trade: Plumber
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,779
|
Re: Accessable Vs Readly Accessable
It is not readily accessible if you have to open a door to get to it. Note access panel it speaks about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Curmudgeon
Trade: carpentry/remodeling/"Yes M'am we do"
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beech Grove, Indiana, Birthplace of the "King of Cool"
Posts: 11,707
|
Re: Accessable Vs Readly Accessable
I thought "removing" was the
pivotal word. I don't have to remove a cabinet door to access the cut offs. No?
__________________
Put your location in your profile! (Sorry....it seems there really are dumb questions) |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Pro Plumber
Trade: Plumber
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,779
|
Re: Accessable Vs Readly Accessable
Interpretation on the code is a tricky one, it gets interpreted by so many, in many ways, in this case, doubt the inspector will view it as it being readily accessible. I don't see it that way myself.
Shut off valve only have to be accessible. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Thom
Trade: General Contractor/Homebuilder
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 3,197
|
Re: Accessable Vs Readly Accessable
The inspector wants it to be visible during regular operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Pompass Ass
Trade: Certified Building and Certified A/C Contractor
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Plant City, Florida
Posts: 2,090
|
Re: Accessable Vs Readly Accessable |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The Grand Wazoo
Trade: It blowed up real good!
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,090
|
Re: Accessable Vs Readly Accessable
If it is in a place that processes or serves food that is not an option, as health code supersedes plumbing code almost everywhere that I know of.
__________________
A flush is better than a full house. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Pompass Ass
Trade: Certified Building and Certified A/C Contractor
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Plant City, Florida
Posts: 2,090
|
Re: Accessable Vs Readly AccessableQuote:
I had to put a lock on a door that was near an electrical panel, because the elctrical inspector wanted it there to keep someone working on the panel from being hit with the door, so I put the lock on, electrical inspector gives us our final. Then the Fire Marshal and building Inspector on the final wants to know why we had a lock on a fire door, I said because the electrical inspector wanted it, they said take it off and if the electrical inspector says anything about, have him call them, because life safety takes precedent over electrical. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The Grand Wazoo
Trade: It blowed up real good!
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,090
|
Re: Accessable Vs Readly Accessable
I find it much easier to just do things right the first time.
__________________
A flush is better than a full house. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Plumbing is a Profession
Trade: Plumbing & HVAC
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: S. Maine
Posts: 157
|
Re: Accessable Vs Readly Accessable
I think that an indirect drain needs to be visible during operation in case it splashes or overflows. Most plumbing inspectors would bag you on that. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Pompass Ass
Trade: Certified Building and Certified A/C Contractor
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Plant City, Florida
Posts: 2,090
|
Re: Accessable Vs Readly AccessableQuote:
I can see both sides of the issue, one the plumbing inspector wants it to be seen in case of a back up. The health inspector doesn't want an indirect drain that can possibly cause splashing and contaminate food products in a kitchen. Relocate the drain out of the kichen area and that will probably make both of them happy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Pro Plumber
Trade: Plumber
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,779
|
Re: Accessable Vs Readly Accessable
You can't win, do what the inspector tells you, plain and simple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
The Grand Wazoo
Trade: It blowed up real good!
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,090
|
Re: Accessable Vs Readly AccessableQuote:
__________________
A flush is better than a full house. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Trade: plumbing
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Posts: 60
|
Re: Accessable Vs Readly Accessable
Health department is not an issue in this case. I used a fixed air gap behind an access panel within the wall cavity to receive the discharge from a water heater TPR and smitty pan drain that is located in an office building restroom attic, inspector wanted them to discharge to the outside of the building, but that is not possible or praticall due to the limitations of indirect waste design requirements. Instead of arguing my point we installed the air gap outside the wall in an exposed location, but now I worry as indirect waste receptors can't be installed in restrooms per code. TPR blow offs are always a problem here in L.A. City high rise buildings, they should really come up with a standardized acceptable method, they will allow them to discharge to mop sinks with am airbreak, but we don't have one here.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
| Go to Page... |
