 |
|
09-25-2009, 09:44 PM
|
#61
|
|
the pipe master
Trade:
plumbing, solar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central, Fl
Posts: 383
|
It's to vary depending on the fill/flush valve design but....yes that black tube is what refills the bowl.
And Ron is correct about excessive pitch being a non-issue.
|
|
|
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury
or death. ContractorTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!
Join the #1 Contractor Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
ContractorTalk.com - Are you a Professional Contractor? If so we invite you to join our community and see what it has to offer. Our site is specifically designed for you and it's the leading place for contractors to meet online. No homeowners asking DIY questions. Just fellow tradesmen who enjoy talking about their business, their trade, and anything else that comes up. No matter what your trade is you'll find that ContractorTalk.com is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally free!
Join ContractorTalk.com - Click Here

|
09-25-2009, 09:46 PM
|
#62
|
|
Pro
Trade:
Construction
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 1,890
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron The Plumber
Correct it helps the bowl water to reach it's operating level after each flush.
|
Cheers Ron thats good to know. I was never 100% sure if that was the reason.
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 09:50 PM
|
#63
|
|
Pro
Trade:
Construction
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 1,890
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by protechplumbing
It's to vary depending on the fill/flush valve design but....yes that black tube is what refills the bowl.
And Ron is correct about excessive pitch being a non-issue.
|
Thanks Protech. As of yet i have never seen a issue with to much slope on a toilet over here so perhaps the combination of Siphon jetted and 3" soil pipe the flow rates are a lot higher and faster to clear the solids. These new 3litre flush cisterns and non water saving pans aint a good combo either in the UK. They are really ment to be used with a water saving pan thats design for a 2 stage flush cistern.
Right im off to bed. Thanks for the info guys.
|
|
|
09-28-2009, 07:11 AM
|
#64
|
|
Registered User
Trade:
Plumbing
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
|
I know that it sounds counterintuitive to say that a 3" line would be more appropriate then a 4". There was a time when I would have argued for the larger line. When the law requiring toilets to flush using no more then 1.6 GPF took effect in the mid '90's, plumbers started noticing stoppages on sewer lines which had previously given satisfactory service. While the general public was complaining about toilets that wouldn't flush, plumbers were trying to fathom this other consequence of a well intentioned law designed to save potable water.
The problem is called inadequate line carry. In other words, the new toilets might evacuate the solids from the bowl, but the amount of water used is so small that it can only carry the solids a fraction of the distance a 5 gallon or even 3.5 gallon flush toilet did. One of the ways to improve line carry is to decrease the diameter of the discharge pipe. This is especially important when dealing with a single rather then a battery of toilets. Though other fixtures also contribute to flow, they, too, have built in restrictions on their gallons per minute. When you add in the fact that this is a guest house, with intermittent usage, the possibilities of stoppages can be magnified. This is due to solids falling out of suspension, partially drying because of sporadic use and creating damns which can trap other solids. Add to this the strong possibility that the toilet used in the guest house will be a 1.3 GPH unit (the about to be enforced government standard), thus decreasing flow even more.
A 3" pipe is no guarantee that a stoppage won't occur, but, with 3" there will be better line carry and wall scouring then with 4". I say this with the conviction of one who knows he will be held accountable if there is a problem down the line.
|
|
|
09-28-2009, 07:16 AM
|
#65
|
|
Registered User
Trade:
Plumbing
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
|
I posed this question to John Koeller, the engineer who tests toilet performance for the CEC and his response (which for the life of me, I can't find) was that they are currently testing line carry and pipe sizing. He says the preliminary results show a better line carry for 3". When they are done with their testing we will have a definitive answer to this question (and some new tables in the model codes).
|
|
|
09-29-2009, 07:52 PM
|
#66
|
|
Member
Trade:
plumbing2heating
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 45
|
[quote=Celtic;772777]Why?
I generally see 4" cast with lead elbows all over.[/qu
I dont know anyone who uses lead bends anymore,as far as the toilet,if you ever look at the opening on the bottom,its only about 2 1/2.You can put 5 toilets on a 3'' line these days,plumbers go by DFU.Thats how lines are sized by the code.
|
|
|
09-29-2009, 09:05 PM
|
#67
|
|
The Grand Wazoo
Trade:
Popcorn Vendor
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,307
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ct plumber
You can put 5 toilets on a 3'' line these days
|
Not in Chicago.
|
|
|
09-29-2009, 09:07 PM
|
#68
|
|
Pro Plumber
Trade:
Plumber
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,778
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ct plumber
You can put 5 toilets on a 3'' line these days
|
Not in Oregon
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyhook
Fact is I'm probably more qualified than 75% of the people on PZ, according to what I've read there.
|
|
|
|
09-29-2009, 10:24 PM
|
#69
|
|
the pipe master
Trade:
plumbing, solar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central, Fl
Posts: 383
|
or Florida
|
|
|
09-29-2009, 10:41 PM
|
#70
|
|
Fentoozler
Trade:
Professional Pie and Pastry Taster
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,589
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ct plumber
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celtic
Why?
I generally see 4" cast with lead elbows all over.
|
I dont know anyone who uses lead bends anymore....
|
Neither do I....but that doesn't mean the lead bends aren't there.
For clarity, I do a lot of old work.
__________________

The UD is quite possibly man kinds finest accomplishment.
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 11:25 AM
|
#71
|
|
Member
Trade:
plumbing2heating
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 45
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by protechplumbing
or Florida
|
Sounds like some other states are behind the times?
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 07:27 PM
|
#72
|
|
the pipe master
Trade:
plumbing, solar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central, Fl
Posts: 383
|
Back when 4" lead arms were the norm, a wc would flush 7 gallons or more. That's more than 4 times what they flush now. More water back then, bigger pipe back then. Less water now, smaller pipe now.
The problems start when people install a 1.28 gpf wc on and old rust scale encrusted 4” line. A service plumber’s wet dream
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celtic
Neither do I....but that doesn't mean the lead bends aren't there.
For clarity, I do a lot of old work.
|
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 07:32 PM
|
#73
|
|
Pro Plumber
Trade:
Plumber
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,778
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celtic
For clarity, I do a lot of old work.
|
So do I
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyhook
Fact is I'm probably more qualified than 75% of the people on PZ, according to what I've read there.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ron The Plumber For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-30-2009, 07:46 PM
|
#74
|
|
Member
Trade:
plumbing
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 89
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron The Plumber
So do I
|
I know you do. All us repair guys have seen our fair share of lead.
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 07:50 PM
|
#75
|
|
Pro Plumber
Trade:
Plumber
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,778
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ARealplumber
I know you do. All us repair guys have seen our fair share of lead. 
|
When you going to become a member on www.plumbingzone.com
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyhook
Fact is I'm probably more qualified than 75% of the people on PZ, according to what I've read there.
|
|
|
|
10-16-2009, 08:07 PM
|
#76
|
|
Registered User
Trade:
Plumbing, Irrigation, Solar Solutions
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 8
|
2 Toliets are allowed on a 3" soil stack SFH's. Closet bends are 3" x 4". However code reuires that the flanged itself, for effectiveness, not be less then 4 1/2", beveled on the top. Now try and get 4" pipe in a 2x4 wall, gl  , cause most SFH's are 2x4 Walls. As far as theory, toilets are designed S-traps, which by code are illegal for any other plumbing fixture, depending on state. IE freeze areas, where you would bring a waste line up threw the bottom of a cabinet, and trap the fixture, not run the waste or water line up in the exterior wall. In SFH's there were never be enough Negitive pressure to siphon P-traps dry allowing sewer gas to engulf a home.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|