|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 | |
|
The Grand Wazoo
Trade: It blowed up real good!
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,089
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ?Quote:
__________________
A flush is better than a full house. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to KillerToiletSpider For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#42 |
|
Pro
Trade: Construction
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 4,721
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Pro Plumber
Trade: Plumber
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,779
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Pro
Trade: Excavation, land clearing, sewer/water
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 272
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Pro Plumber
Trade: Plumber
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,779
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ? |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Ron The Plumber For This Useful Post: | Williams Ex Co (09-25-2009) |
|
|
#46 |
|
The Grand Wazoo
Trade: It blowed up real good!
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,089
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ?
With the advent of 1.3 GPF toilets we slowly came to realize that 1/4" per foot was actually too much, and that 1/8" caused far less problems, but you should be installing it to your states code.
__________________
A flush is better than a full house. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to KillerToiletSpider For This Useful Post: | Williams Ex Co (09-25-2009) |
|
|
#47 |
|
Moderator
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ?
The smaller 3" pipe will allow solids to carry further downstream than a 4" pipe will. This has to do with how much flooding occurs in the pipe during flush and when this flooding becomes too shallow to push solids along any more.
Sanitary sewer systems are designed to run at 60 percent capacity, allowing the other 40 percent for air. Contrast this to storm sewer systems which are designed to run at 100 percent capacity. The reason for 3" is two fold. Its cheaper/lighter/easier to install (or so the theory goes) and toilets use less and less water and don't need the bigger pipe to achieve the target of approximately 35 feet of wash down at 1/4" per foot of pitch. Now that we have all been bored to tears, can we please play nicely now?
__________________
"My clients’ wishes are the center of my attention." -- David Guido, a contractor in Woodstock, N.Y. New York Times, July 20, 2006 |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Double-A For This Useful Post: | protechplumbing (09-25-2009) |
|
|
#48 |
|
the pipe master
Trade: plumbing, solar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central, Fl
Posts: 497
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ?
Sorry for the delay on this one. I missed the e-mail
![]() Ok, the reason that 3" is the better choice is because of velocity and flow channel depth as Double-A said. You want more velocity to push those turds down the line. Don't believe me? OK here's is an experiment for you. Get a piece of 2" pipe and a piece of 4" pipe. Set them both at the same pitch say 1/4" per ft. Now crack a sillcock open and put the end of the hose over the top of one of the pipes and set a small object in the line. Time the object to get to the end of the pipe. Repeat with the other pipe(don't mess with the flow rate coming out of the hose during the experiment). Try it with different objects. You'll notice that the smaller line always wins. The main reason that older houses had 4" water closet lines and you see mostly 3" now'a days is because toilets used to flush 3-4 times more water than they do now. Less water means a smaller pipe. I could get all technical with manning’s equation but I think this dumbed down version pretty much gets the point across. Got it?
__________________
Plumber, Repiping, Replumbing, Leak Detection, Solar Water Heater, Polk County Plumber, Lakeland Plumber, Winter Haven Plumber |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
BLDG Inspector, G.C
Trade: BLDG Inspector, G.C
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: N,Calif. Between Sacramento & San Francisco.
Posts: 186
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ?
PPPP
Sorry I had to let that one go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Pro
Trade: Construction
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 4,721
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ?Yes true. I my self have been to many new builds where the fall was far to much for the length of run. What happens is the solids move a lot slower than the water flows so the solids get left behind. Every plumber should know this. Happens a lot in UK with 4" soil and dual flush toilets. Happens less with the 3" as the volume of water to free air space is higher. But i like i have said i see far more blocked toilets over here compaired to UK. |
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
Pro Plumber
Trade: Plumber
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,779
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ?
We have thousands of homes built on hills around here and the sewer lines all go down hill full bubble on the level, there are not alot of sewer stoppages on those lines, so yes I repeat it is not true about too much slope. Don't believe I live around hills, Google Eugene Oregon and see my surroundings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
Pro
Trade: Construction
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 4,721
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ?Quote:
I also have seen sewers with drops which have fully broken a bubble and they have kept clear also. Mainly just because of the volume of water passing through them. With toilets its a different matter. If the toilet is used often it may not cause an issue but if it's used as little as once a day that solid if left behind will almost weld it's self to the soil pipe as it dries out. Flush another one a day later and that will do the same and so on until they build up to a complette blockage. Im just glad i was never the the person to clean them out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Pro Plumber
Trade: Plumber
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,779
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ?
If there is problem in a line it is because of roots of others problems, slope is not a factor, now not enough slope yes, but more then needed slope/grade is always a good thing,
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
the pipe master
Trade: plumbing, solar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central, Fl
Posts: 497
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ?
The reason toilets back up less in the UK is due to the toilet design not the drains. You did know that right?
Quote:
__________________
Plumber, Repiping, Replumbing, Leak Detection, Solar Water Heater, Polk County Plumber, Lakeland Plumber, Winter Haven Plumber |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
Pro
Trade: Construction
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 4,721
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ?Quote:
Yep thats what i posted them pics for in the other post. The UK pans have a wider throat, outlet and the traps are also a lot more free flowing. They require a lot less back pressure to shift anything in the pan. The traps newer ones that come with the dual flush valves would sometimes give you problems but not very often. The lowest flush setting was never designed to shift solids but most of the time it can. The US toilets are getting better though. I fitted one for my bro in law the other week and the thing would use about 1.5 liters from my calculation and it would take away what ever what put down the thing. Was pretty impressed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
the pipe master
Trade: plumbing, solar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central, Fl
Posts: 497
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ?
try again
__________________
Plumber, Repiping, Replumbing, Leak Detection, Solar Water Heater, Polk County Plumber, Lakeland Plumber, Winter Haven Plumber |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Pro
Trade: Construction
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 4,721
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ?
I would also say that the 9 liter flush helps but i have seen that size of here as much as the UK.
Also not every house has a high level cistern like you guys see on TV all the time on english shows. 99% are either low level or close coupled. Last edited by BCConstruction; 09-25-2009 at 10:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
the pipe master
Trade: plumbing, solar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central, Fl
Posts: 497
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ?
The correct answer was.......
Toilets are siphon jetted in the USA and they are of a washdown design in the UK. Do I need to outline the differences between the two and the pros and cons of the two designs?
__________________
Plumber, Repiping, Replumbing, Leak Detection, Solar Water Heater, Polk County Plumber, Lakeland Plumber, Winter Haven Plumber |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
Pro
Trade: Construction
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 4,721
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ?Quote:
That explains why the pan traps over here gets sucked dry. Upto yet i have only come across that one the other week that really worked as i expected it to. Does this also have something to do with the rubber hose on the fill valve that drains straight into the over flow? Thats another thing the valves in the UK dont have. perhaps you can expalin what that things for. No ones been able to tell me upto yet. I thought it might have been for filling the trap back up as they sure do let a lot of water out of the over flow! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
|
Pro Plumber
Trade: Plumber
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,779
|
Re: 3" Or 4" ?Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| j-channel with 3" deep pocket. | thesidingpro | Windows, Siding and Doors | 20 | 07-10-2011 09:23 PM |
| Extending 4" studs to 5 1/2" | Danno6102 | Carpentry | 18 | 05-29-2009 07:38 PM |
| Is this in Your area yet??? 4" sharkbites ???? | Driftwood | Plumbing | 11 | 09-25-2008 06:59 PM |
| Tapping into a 4" PVC Drain | Michael S | Plumbing | 3 | 08-11-2008 11:45 PM |
| 3" verse 4" painting siding, and boxing | Dave Mac | Painting & Finish Work | 2 | 12-11-2007 04:32 PM |
| Go to Page... |
