|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Pro
Trade: Painting Contractor
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 274
|
I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic Latex
Here's the deal, I'm painting a family friends house. The trim was never prepped correctly from the start, we've had to caulk and sand ALL door jambs and baseboards. The trim actually just had flat wall paint on it, it was the same color as the walls.
Of course I come in and shoot my line about SW Pro Classic and how beautiful it will look. We've had to give this trim two coats of paint, which I thought would cover in one. It had antique white flat on it before. I'm a little disappointed it didn't cover any better in the first coat and also the semigloss doesn't really have the shine it should. It looks like a good quality satin finish to me. My buddy, who's a twenty year pro asked me if it was satin. Of course I cut the gallon using floetrol because the stuff won't brush out if you don't. I love the oil base Pro Classic, but with the phase out of oil products I'm really scrambling now to find a top quality latex trim paint. Anyone else feel a little anxiety over oil being phased out. Benjamin Moore isn't really an option because it's twenty five miles away from my house. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Curmudgeon
Trade: carpentry/remodeling/"Yes M'am we do"
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beech Grove, Indiana, Birthplace of the "King of Cool"
Posts: 11,707
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic Latex
I don't spray,but I love ProClassic!
Best latex trim I've ever come across.
__________________
Put your location in your profile! (Sorry....it seems there really are dumb questions) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
A bit abrasive.
Trade: Painting
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: KC KS/MO
Posts: 1,529
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic Latex
We have discussed ProClassic latex in great detail in another thread actually.
And yes I am fearful of losing solvent based materials it is going to change the way I paint. If it ruins my ability to paint I will leave the field and let Home Depot turn every retarded homeowner into a professional painter with a Saturday class on masking with tape... ffs. homeowners that think they can paint and the box stores that can "help".
__________________
My advice: Hire a real painter to do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Pro
Trade: Painting Contractor
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 274
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic Latex
Do you cut it with floetrol or water? I've found that it needs to be cut with floetrol but still thickens up as the day wears on. I've never been able to just brush it straight out of the can which I cut all my paints anyway.
Maybe I'll switch to the gloss Pro Classic, I've long thought their semigloss is not quite the sheen it should be. To me it's a satin paint in semigloss labeling. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
A bit abrasive.
Trade: Painting
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: KC KS/MO
Posts: 1,529
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic Latex
Latex never has the same sheen build as the awesome alkyds do, I have only used floetrol once and I wasn't able to find a happy medium before I trashed the gallon of paint I use water in ceiling flat material if I only need a gallon more to finish. I would use gloss latex to finish with a satin/semi sheen.
__________________
My advice: Hire a real painter to do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Pro
Trade: Painting Contractor
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 274
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic Latex
Wise,
You're absolutely correct, the oil sheen is just night and day different than any wb products I've used. There is one water product from Porter paints that is very good stuff. It's called Acrylic Eggshell Semigloss and sells for 30-35 a gallon to the pro's, 45-50 to the HO's. This stuff is the bomb and maybe I'll start slinging it, although I promised myself years ago that Porter wouldn't get my business. The name is deceiving but it is a semigloss paint which is probably the best trim paint I've used. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
A bit abrasive.
Trade: Painting
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: KC KS/MO
Posts: 1,529
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic Latex
I have just started using Porter since I moved into one of their districts. The interior leaves much to be desired from what I have seen, but I do respect their elastomeric exterior product.
It is tough for me to break with SW, I feel dirty however there are some paint manufacturers that have a superior product sometimes.
__________________
My advice: Hire a real painter to do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Pro
Trade: Painting Contractor
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 274
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic Latex
Their interior wall paints are second tier compared to SW, they don't seem to cover as well or tu as well. Their one interior product I really like is the trim paint I mentioned. They do have some nice exterior paints and stains though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
A bit abrasive.
Trade: Painting
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: KC KS/MO
Posts: 1,529
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic LatexQuote:
I was so frustrated when the Hides All didn't hide diddly squat that I called the manager and asked him what the story was. I threw SW in his face and he said that Porter paint has a much lower titanium oxide content than SW's "Pure White" base. I respected his professional and quite honest no frills answer, he nailed it without pause. I wouldn't mind checking out a Porter product that is highly recommended.
__________________
My advice: Hire a real painter to do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Pro
Trade: Painting Contractor
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Huntsville Alabama
Posts: 1,349
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic Latex
I made the switch from oil to waterbourne about 4 years ago and it was a tough switch. It took awhile to get use to the lack of sheen and the overall difference in oil. I have gone through many different trim paints while trying to find a good one. I used manor hall for awhile along with super paint. These days i use ICI Dulux for my trim. It is a good finish paint.
You just have to adjust in this business, be willing to switch up your game and try something different. Oil is being phased out and once you get used to the waterbournes they sort of grow on you. Quote:
porters glyptex is suppose to be a great product.
__________________
Sean Last edited by Workaholic; 01-17-2009 at 12:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Pro
Trade: painting and refinishing
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 225
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic Latex
dorman, I completely agree with the sheen levels. I always tell the client if they want a sheen go with gloss pro classic. the semi gloss in my opinion looks to have about the same sheen as my satin wall paints. some people don't care for the glossy look. I love proclassic because I feel like it levels out real well. However, I always do two coats. If I am spraying over white I could probably get by with one. However, almost always we two coat proclassic to get the desired look. Just my 2 cent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
A bit abrasive.
Trade: Painting
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: KC KS/MO
Posts: 1,529
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic LatexQuote:
I guess the first thing I will appreciate about all water based materials is the clean up time I will save at the pump. And the lack of charges for mineral spirits or lacquer thinner to use for cleaning. What about lacquers though? Nothing is more awesome than a clear lacquer finish.
__________________
My advice: Hire a real painter to do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
vandy
Trade: painting, decorating, wallcovering
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 266
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic Latex
sw duration!
screw that Pro Classic Latex (unless i can spray it) |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
A bit abrasive.
Trade: Painting
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: KC KS/MO
Posts: 1,529
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic LatexQuote:
no. and yes. I mentioned to my new SW manager that Duration was another way SW can suck money from customer's wallets without offering a better product. She agreed. It might as well be SuperPaint re~packaged and sold as Duration for 10 more dollars. Classic99 satin is actually ProMar200 re~packaged. SW is sneaky that way.
__________________
My advice: Hire a real painter to do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
vandy
Trade: painting, decorating, wallcovering
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 266
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic Latex
i've never heard that about Duration. and i dont want to believe it because i love me some Duration.
i've also never really used Superpaint on interior trim, but now i'll try it. now i know that Exterior Duration and Ext Superpaint arent even on the same radar. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Pro
Trade: Painting Contractor
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 274
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic Latex
I've always heard that Classic99 was/is the same thing as Pro Mar 200 repackaged. That said, I've only used it one time and I'm not sure why they still sell it. Most pros I know use the pro mar or superpaint grades. I may try the Classic99 though if I can get a better price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
A bit abrasive.
Trade: Painting
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: KC KS/MO
Posts: 1,529
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic LatexQuote:
This year I am going to switch up a notch and ease into a new system. SuperPaint flat/satin walls, and Classic99 flat for ceilings. If you have really high ceilings and don't want to mess around for too long up there use Classic99 flat. 1 coat and you are down.
__________________
My advice: Hire a real painter to do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
A bit abrasive.
Trade: Painting
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: KC KS/MO
Posts: 1,529
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic LatexQuote:
Sorry bud, Sherwin Williams is the epitome of evil. When your company has been around long before Ford and will be around long after Ford, you are slicker than...well you know. They are obviously masters of the business realm and will therefor do what is necessary to stay alive. Gawd I love that!!!
__________________
My advice: Hire a real painter to do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Pro
Trade: Painting Contractor
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Huntsville Alabama
Posts: 1,349
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic LatexQuote:
Yes it is nice not to be buying paint thinner all the time these days. Pretty good savings over all.
__________________
Sean |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Pro
Trade: Painting & Remodeling
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 514
|
Re: I'm Disappointed In SW Pro Classic Latex
I've noticed that the SW WB Pro Classic satin isnt really a satin also. Has more of a low lustre melamine sheen. Think I'm going to try a few test panels with the semi-gloss to see how it turns out.
I havent had any problems with brushing the product either. I just add Floetrol or XIM Extender; think I like the XIM product better. I've switched to probably 95% SW products over the years, and other than a few application adjustments I havent had any problems. You guys might want to try CHB White on ceilings, the stuff is real nice. I also use it as a primer on new drywall and wall repairs. Just finished a basement using Sher-Pro Flat as that is what the customer had used when the house was built. That came out real nice too. Used a 14" roller with a wool 3/4 nap. Quick question for Wise: Do they make the Colosuss for a 14" frame? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| why is latex paint peeling?? | Zeebo | Painting & Finish Work | 24 | 05-28-2009 07:59 AM |
| Latex over Oil base paint is peeling | iceman61 | Painting & Finish Work | 19 | 10-16-2008 12:44 AM |
| latex semi gloss over oil semi gloss - can it be done? | Zeebo | Painting & Finish Work | 13 | 09-05-2007 06:38 PM |
| Proposals...... | AAPaint | Painting & Finish Work | 3 | 08-25-2007 09:47 AM |
| Am I outrageous? | AAPaint | Painting & Finish Work | 39 | 02-16-2007 12:58 AM |
| Go to Page... |
