 |
|
12-18-2007, 07:53 PM
|
#1
|
|
New Guy
Trade:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 20
|
# of wires allowed under each neutral screw
Has anyone ever heard that you are only allowed to put one wire in each loation on the neutral bar. I have a building inspector that wrote up this, but I never heard this before. Each hole has 1,2,3 wires in each spot and they are all cut too short to move down to the open holes. How can I prove this isn't a code issue?
Last edited by DMC; 12-18-2007 at 07:56 PM.
Reason: misspell
|
|
|
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury
or death. ContractorTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!
Join the #1 Contractor Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
ContractorTalk.com - Are you a Professional Contractor? If so we invite you to join our community and see what it has to offer. Our site is specifically designed for you and it's the leading place for contractors to meet online. No homeowners asking DIY questions. Just fellow tradesmen who enjoy talking about their business, their trade, and anything else that comes up. No matter what your trade is you'll find that ContractorTalk.com is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally free!
Join ContractorTalk.com - Click Here

|
12-18-2007, 07:57 PM
|
#2
|
|
Remodeler Extraordinare
Trade:
General Contractor
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bay Area California
Posts: 810
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
How can I prove this isn't a code issue?
|
It is a code issue.
I dont have my NEC code book in front of me (it's at home) But I do know for a fact that you cannot share the lugs on a nuetral bus in a subpanel with other nuetrals.
|
|
|
12-18-2007, 08:25 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered
Trade:
Super Electrician
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 582
|
Some panels let you put 2 or 3 grounds under one lug but not neutrals. There's no law against taking a wirenut and making the neutrals longer to reach the other holes.
|
|
|
12-18-2007, 08:44 PM
|
#4
|
|
New Guy
Trade:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 20
|
I went to the manufacturer website and it sounds like the panel is designed for multiple conductors on the neutral lugs, so what's the issue. It certainly wouldn't make sense to twist-lok wires onto each wire to make them longer. Does anyone know the thought behind not allowing multiple conductors on each screw lug.
Homeline PDF file:
Neutral Assemblies
All lugs suitable for copper or aluminum wire (see Main Lugs and Main
Circuit Breaker Ratings on page 20)
Branch neutral terminals suitable for one #14#4 AWG copper or one
#12#4 AWG aluminum wire
Three #141/0 AWG copper or #14#6 AWG aluminum terminals
provided on 1242 circuits, 100 225 A load centers
Suitable lugs provided on the neutrals for termination of the grounding
conductor
All unused neutral terminals may be used to terminate bare or green
equipment grounding conductors when the load center is used as
service equipment:
one or two #14# 12 AWG copper
one or two #12# 10 AWG aluminum
|
|
|
12-18-2007, 09:03 PM
|
#5
|
|
Remodeler Extraordinare
Trade:
General Contractor
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bay Area California
Posts: 810
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
I went to the manufacturer website and it sounds like the panel is designed for multiple conductors on the neutral lugs, so what's the issue. It certainly wouldn't make sense to twist-lok wires onto each wire to make them longer. Does anyone know the thought behind not allowing multiple conductors on each screw lug.
Homeline PDF file:
Neutral Assemblies
Branch neutral terminals suitable for one #14#4 AWG copper or one
#12#4 AWG aluminum wire
All unused neutral terminals may be used to terminate bare or green
equipment grounding conductors when the load center is used as
service equipment:
one or two #14# 12 AWG copper
one or two #12# 10 AWG aluminum
|
In red
|
|
|
12-18-2007, 09:23 PM
|
#6
|
|
Electrical Contractor
Trade:
Electrical
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY State
Posts: 1,952
|
Either the instructions clearly highlighted in red above, or this:
408.41 Grounded Conductor Terminations
Each grounded conductor shall terminate within the panelboard in an individual terminal that is not also used for another conductor.
...make this a code violation.
__________________
|
|
|
12-18-2007, 09:25 PM
|
#7
|
|
New Guy
Trade:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 20
|
one line under that say "Three #14–1/0 AWG copper or #14–#6 AWG aluminum"
|
|
|
12-18-2007, 09:27 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered
Trade:
Super Electrician
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 582
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
It certainly wouldn't make sense to twist-lok wires onto each wire to make them longer.
|
It makes perfect sense. Come on Dude, you're the guy jamming several neutrals under one screw, sensibility flew out the window long ago! Do like your Uncle Condulet says and add some white wire to those neutrals and screw them into those free holes at the bottom of the bus.
|
|
|
12-18-2007, 09:42 PM
|
#9
|
|
New Guy
Trade:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 20
|
I'm not the one who wired the house. I'm just the one hired to fix all the code violations. From a reliability standpoint, screwing wires down under a screw, vs using wire twist loks, I think the first is much more dependable. Where were at there are no building codes, just a inspector hired for selling the house. I can cut the wires and twist lok them to satisfy this issue but sounds like a dumb thing to do. Still waiting for someone to tell me why you wouldn't want to screw the wires together under one screw since the neutral bar and screw can easily handle the current from 2 - 3 20A circuits.
|
|
|
12-18-2007, 09:51 PM
|
#10
|
|
Electrical Contractor
Trade:
Electrical
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY State
Posts: 1,952
|
You obviously don't know the code very well and are looking for someone to agree with you.
Are you an electrician?
Read the instructions again, carefully, it is VERY clear what they are saying. ONE neutral per hole. Up to two ground per hole.
• Branch neutral terminals suitable for one #14–#4 AWG copper or one
#12–#4 AWG aluminum wire"
• All unused neutral terminals may be used to terminate bare or green
equipment grounding conductors when the load center is used as
service equipment:
— one or two #14–# 12 AWG copper
— one or two #12–# 10 AWG aluminum
• Three #14–1/0 AWG copper or #14–#6 AWG aluminum terminals
provided on 12–42 circuits, 100– 225 A load centers
All this is telling you is that three larger holes are provided on the bar. NOT that you can put three conductors in that hole.
Pigtail the wires and place each neutral under it's own screw.
__________________
|
|
|
12-18-2007, 09:57 PM
|
#11
|
|
Remodeler Extraordinare
Trade:
General Contractor
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bay Area California
Posts: 810
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
Still waiting for someone to tell me why you wouldn't want to screw the wires together under one screw since the neutral bar and screw can easily handle the current from 2 - 3 20A circuits.
|
As previously stated by Speedy Peetey via the NEC
408.41 Grounded Conductor Terminations
Each grounded conductor shall terminate within the panelboard in an individual terminal that is not also used for another conductor.
|
|
|
12-18-2007, 10:11 PM
|
#12
|
|
Fentoozler
Trade:
Professional Pie and Pastry Taster
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,589
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
Still waiting for someone to tell me why you wouldn't want to screw the wires together under one screw since the neutral bar and screw can easily handle the current from 2 - 3 20A circuits.
|
The reason WHY? is simple...
SHOCK and/or DEATH
If you shut off only 1 circuit and have the neutral from 2 circuits under that one screw, there is a possibility you (as in your body) could complete the circuitry from neutral to neutral bus.
Here is the commentary from the NECH in regards to Multi wire Branch Circuits (MWBC).
Quote:
|
Multiwire branch circuits can be dangerous. Section 210.4(B) specifically requires simultaneous disconnection of all ungrounded conductors and requires that it take place at the panelboard of origin. The reason for this requirement is to reduce the risk of shock should a worker fail to disconnect all of the ungrounded circuits to the equipment mounted on a single yoke or strap of a device. Most commonly, receptacles are the focus of this requirement. However, equipment mounted on a yoke can include devices such as receptacles, switches, and lampholders, as well as other items such as dimmers, pilot lights, and home automation controls.
|
EDIT TO ADD:
If you failed to turn off any CBs, the risk still remains as you (as in your body) could complete the path to the grounded bus.
__________________

The UD is quite possibly man kinds finest accomplishment.
Last edited by Celtic; 12-18-2007 at 10:18 PM.
|
|
|
12-18-2007, 10:30 PM
|
#13
|
|
Pro
Trade:
Union Electrician
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 135
|
Or think about it this way: you go into the panel to rework something, loosen the screw on the neutral bar and both wires come out. Now you have an open neutral! Not to mention the danger (as stated above) of the same condition occurring on a multi-wire branch circuit.
I think the code, not to mention the manufacturer is VERY clear on this subject.
|
|
|
12-18-2007, 11:22 PM
|
#14
|
|
New Guy
Trade:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 20
|
No, I'm not an electrician. I do have a background in Electrical engineering. This is a residential 200A Service panel that has the neutral bar bonded to the Ground bar. A total of 60 holes for both neutral and ground and they are intermixed along the 2 bus bars.
1) From a danger standpoint, there's no difference between taking the 2 neutrals and twisting them together and then extending one wire to the neutral bar, than just putting both neutral wires together under one of the netral bar lug screws.
|
|
|
12-18-2007, 11:51 PM
|
#15
|
|
God Bless America
Trade:
Electrician
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rahway, New Jersey
Posts: 3,400
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
No, I'm not an electrician. I do have a background in Electrical engineering. This is a residential 200A Service panel that has the neutral bar bonded to the Ground bar. A total of 60 holes for both neutral and ground and they are intermixed along the 2 bus bars.
1) From a danger standpoint, there's no difference between taking the 2 neutrals and twisting them together and then extending one wire to the neutral bar, than just putting both neutral wires together under one of the netral bar lug screws.
|
Sure there is. If you were to pigtail the GROUNDED CONDUCTORS, and both of the 120 volt circuits were on the same phase, then the neutral conductor would carry the combined load of both circuits to ground. This installation could overload the grounded (neutral) conductor and start a fire since there's no fused protection of the grounded conductor.
If you're not electrician and are seeking advice, then take our advice.
|
|
|
12-18-2007, 11:57 PM
|
#16
|
|
Fentoozler
Trade:
Professional Pie and Pastry Taster
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,589
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
1) From a danger standpoint, there's no difference between taking the 2 neutrals and twisting them together and then extending one wire to the neutral bar, than just putting both neutral wires together under one of the netral bar lug screws.
|
...and you would be correct - up until the point where one those connections were to be opened.
....and that is why 408.41 prohibits the practice.
The inspector that wrote up the violation is CORRECT.
Next time you want to play electrician, hire one and hold the flashlight for him.
__________________

The UD is quite possibly man kinds finest accomplishment.
|
|
|
12-18-2007, 11:57 PM
|
#17
|
|
God Bless America
Trade:
Electrician
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rahway, New Jersey
Posts: 3,400
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by goose134
Or think about it this way: you go into the panel to rework something, loosen the screw on the neutral bar and both wires come out. Now you have an open neutral! Not to mention the danger (as stated above) of the same condition occurring on a multi-wire branch circuit.
I think the code, not to mention the manufacturer is VERY clear on this subject. 
|
For instance.... if you did that, and one of the things on that multiwire branch circuit was a new 65" Sony HDTV.... guess what.... that board just fried-out because the resistance in a series circuit (240 volts) is additive.
So go right ahead and pigtail those neutrals together... then explain to the guy why is tv is broke for the New Years Day college bowl games.
Good luck!
|
|
|
12-19-2007, 12:25 AM
|
#18
|
|
New Guy
Trade:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 20
|
I guess there's a concensus that each neutral needs to be extended in length so that they will reach and enable connection to one wire per hole in the neutral bar. This is all so that if someone loosens a neutral screw that has 2 wires in it, and doesn't turn off the breaker, and has his sony plasma screen on, blah blah blah. If you are reworking the panel I would expect that you turned off the main (yes this panel has one of those). Last posting I meant that extending each wire to reach 2 side by side hole locations was no different than putting both wires together under one screw. Therefore the current would not be on one conductor
|
|
|
12-19-2007, 01:10 AM
|
#19
|
|
Thom
Trade:
General Contractor/Homebuilder
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 1,929
|
DMC, don't try to argue logic with the code. You will lose. The inspectors don't really care what your logic is, the book is book.
On another note, around here we can't splice inside a panel. We would need to add a pull box outside the panel to splice. If it were just one splice the inspector would say you can't do that (He's told me) but let it go. In your case, no way he'd let it go.
|
|
|
12-19-2007, 01:14 AM
|
#20
|
|
Registered
Trade:
Super Electrician
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 582
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thom
DMC, don't try to argue logic with the code. You will lose. The inspectors don't really care what your logic is, the book is book.
|
This is not a real inspector. It's a real estate inspector.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|