Contractor Talk - Construction and Remodeling Site
CLICK HERE AND JOIN OUR COMMUNITY TODAY...IT'S FREE!
Go Back   Contractor Talk - Professional Construction and Remodeling Forum > Trade Talk > Electrical > NEC Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-20-2008, 02:25 AM   #1
Pro
Trade: Solar/Electrical
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 119
Conduit fill

Table C.10 in the 2008 NEC (based on Table 1, chp 9) seems to be saying that you can put up to 5 THWN conductors in 1/2" Schedule 40 PVC.

As I understand it there would be a deration to 80% of the ampacity for conduit fill for 4-6 current carrying conductors.

Am I missing something? It just seems like 5 #10s is too much for 1/2".

It's not for a new installation. There's an existing, empty, 1/2" PVC conduit running through concrete.

newenergy is offline   Reply With Quote
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury or death. ContractorTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!

Join Contractor Talk

Join the #1 Contractor Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

ContractorTalk.com - Are you a Professional Contractor? If so we invite you to join our community and see what it has to offer. Our site is specifically designed for you and it's the leading place for contractors to meet online. No homeowners asking DIY questions. Just fellow tradesmen who enjoy talking about their business, their trade, and anything else that comes up. No matter what your trade is you'll find that ContractorTalk.com is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally free!

Join ContractorTalk.com - Click Here JOIN FOR FREE

Old 04-20-2008, 07:19 AM   #2
Baltimore Electrician
 
JohnJ0906's Avatar
Trade: Electrician
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,199
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenergy View Post
Table C.10 in the 2008 NEC (based on Table 1, chp 9) seems to be saying that you can put up to 5 THWN conductors in 1/2" Schedule 40 PVC.

As I understand it there would be a deration to 80% of the ampacity for conduit fill for 4-6 current carrying conductors.

Am I missing something? It just seems like 5 #10s is too much for 1/2".

It's not for a new installation. There's an existing, empty, 1/2" PVC conduit running through concrete.
Not every conductor is a CCC, necessarily. You might have a 3 ph MWBC (full boat) with 3 hots, a neutral and an EGC. 5 conductors, but only 3 CCCs.
__________________
John from Baltimore
"One Day at a Time"
All replies based on the 2008 NEC
Quote:
Originally Posted by celtic
Deny Everything, Admit Nothing, Demand Proof
JohnJ0906 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008, 07:39 AM   #3
Electrical Contractor
 
Speedy Petey's Avatar
Trade: Electrical
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY State
Posts: 1,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenergy View Post
Am I missing something? It just seems like 5 #10s is too much for 1/2".
Sometimes it is too much, but it is allowed. That's just the way it is.

What John said about derating. Not every single conductor is counted as a CCC.
__________________

Speedy Petey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008, 11:41 AM   #4
Pro
Trade: Solar/Electrical
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 119
Thx - Just to be clear, the limit of 5, which is based on the cross section of the conductor and insulation doesn't care if the conductor is carrying current or not. Whether they carry current or not just affects the deration.

?

So, actually what I might possibly be putting through this conduit is:

2 10-THWN
1 10-bare copper
2 12-THWN
1 12 bare copper

From tables 5 and 8 I get the total area = (13.61 * 2) + 5.26100 + 3.31 + (8.58100 * 2) = 52.953 sq mm

and from table 4 sched 40 is 184 sq mm

and table 1 I can fill up to 40%, so I'm good

Seem right?

Is this a bad practice? The customer is expecting to have to tear things up and install new conduit, but I'm trying to save them some money as long as it's not a bad practice.

Last night I had a dream about pulling this wire. It wasn't that bad in the dream. Will it be a nightmare IRL?
newenergy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008, 12:21 PM   #5
Fentoozler
 
Celtic's Avatar
Trade: Professional Pie and Pastry Taster
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,589
Why would you put 2 bare EGC's in a conduit?
__________________


The UD is quite possibly man kinds finest accomplishment.
Celtic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008, 12:58 PM   #6
Pro
Trade: Solar/Electrical
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celtic View Post
Why would you put 2 bare EGC's in a conduit?
One is for the Solar PV system. On the roof everyone uses bare copper. This may only be for ease of installation since you have to ground every single rail and every single module and you run them through lugs.

I was taught that it is a good practice to have the PV grounding be one continuous conductor all the way from the roof to the inverter. I know a lot of people don't do that in practice though because it is difficult to deal with that much wire on the roof.

690.43 - the grounding conductor must be contained in the same raceway as the circuit conductor.

The other wires would be for a 120v AC circuit. The ground wire for those doesn't need to be bare, but bare is smaller.

The grounding wire for the Solar needs to connect to the inverter.

Perhaps it would be better if the AC ground were insulated as I don't think any fault current from the AC circuit should go through the inverter.

Were you asking why I would use bare conductors or why I would have 2 grounding conductors instead of just one?
newenergy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008, 02:49 PM   #7
Fentoozler
 
Celtic's Avatar
Trade: Professional Pie and Pastry Taster
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenergy View Post

Were you asking why I would use bare conductors or why I would have 2 grounding conductors instead of just one?
Having 2 bare in one conduit seems odd - especially when they are of different sizes.

How does 1 insulated #8 size up against the bare 12 & 10?
__________________


The UD is quite possibly man kinds finest accomplishment.
Celtic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008, 05:18 PM   #8
Pro
Trade: Solar/Electrical
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 119
A insulated 8 is considerably bigger than a bare 12 and 10 put together.

Capacity isn't the problem. A bare 10 would be adequate for either purpose and I don't know why it wouldn't be adequate for both.

The problem is that one ground wire is (according to manufacturer specs) supposed to go in a certain terminal in the inverter and the other is supposed to go to the grounding bus in the service panel.

In theory, I don't know why you couldn't bond the equipment ground for the AC circuit onto the ground for the DC circuit at each piece of equipment running along the conduit and then jump off it before the inverter and go into the service panel. I just wouldn't want to mess with the inverter wiring unless I was sure and even then I would probably want something from the manufacturer because something else could go wrong and they could blame it on the AC ground wire.

If I do change that one 12 bare to 12 THWN, I add (8.581 - 3.31) 5.271, giving me 58 sq mm, so I'm still good with that.
newenergy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 10:42 AM   #9
Pro
Trade: Solar/Electrical
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 119
Interesting discussion and I appreciate everyone's help, but in this case it's moot.

690.4(B) = I can't mix PV circuit with other circuit in a conduit.

Fortunately, I told the owners at first pass that they would need a new conduit run. I was just trying to figure if I could save them that.
newenergy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Patio & spa pad over fill questions deckman22 Concrete & Paving 4 01-27-2008 06:14 PM
Slab on Grade fill options? James Ellis Construction 10 10-24-2006 12:55 AM
Pricing for painting 1" conduit saucedo80 Painting & Finish Work 10 10-06-2006 12:27 AM
Removing old wiring from conduit duke Electrical 3 01-29-2006 11:04 PM




Top of Page | View New Posts


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 PM.


Contractor Talk™ © 2003 - 2009 The Building Network LLC