|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
NEC Consultant
Trade: NEC Consultant & Instructor since 1969
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 74
|
2008 NEC Proposed Changes |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
DGR,IABD
Trade: Electrical; Commercial and Residential Service
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 9,680
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes
The two changes that I see that will effect me on a regular basis are:
All 15 and 20 amp branch 120 volt branch circuits will need AFCI protection. That will put an end to multi-wire branch circuits in dwellings unless I'm installing a CutlerHammer panel. The conductors of a multiwire branch circuit need a zip-tie around them in the panel. This is stupid, but whatever. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Electrical Contractor
Trade: Electrical
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY State
Posts: 2,179
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes
If the AFCI thing is passed I will be apalled! That is complete BS!
From the feedback I have been seeing it is not likely to pass. Anyone care to comment? Marc, when using conduit I ALWAYS bundle my multi-wire circuits. Even if it is the only circuit in a conduit. I get livid when someone doesn't and you have to go trouble shoot things. Why are you against this?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Pro
Trade: Licensed Colorado electrician, licensed B-1 GC
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Colorado Front Range
Posts: 2,604
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed ChangesQuote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
DGR,IABD
Trade: Electrical; Commercial and Residential Service
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 9,680
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed ChangesQuote:
EDIT... now that I reread it, I see that it only applies to more than one multi wire circuit in the same conduit. I always did one of two things in that instance; bundle them like the proposal suggests, or run one set in solid and one set in stranded. I normally don't run more than 2 sets of multiwire circuits in a conduit, because you start to bump into derating concerns. Last edited by mdshunk; 09-24-2006 at 01:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Electrical Contractor
Trade: Electrical
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY State
Posts: 2,179
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed ChangesQuote:
![]() Just to spark a lively debate, you do know you can run up to four sets of multi-wire circuits in a conduit before derating is a concern, don't you?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
DGR,IABD
Trade: Electrical; Commercial and Residential Service
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 9,680
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes
3 phase? no. Single phase, yes. I think that "9" is just about the magic number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
DGR,IABD
Trade: Electrical; Commercial and Residential Service
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 9,680
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes
From a business standpoint, I do hope the AFCI proposal passes. I'm an AFCI troubleshooting wiz, and that proposal would be fantastic for me. Until the combination type AFCI's come out, I'm not sure what benefit the present generation of AFCI's will provide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Electrical Contractor
Trade: Electrical
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY State
Posts: 2,179
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes
Yes. I should have been more clear.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Electrician
Trade: Electrician
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 295
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
DGR,IABD
Trade: Electrical; Commercial and Residential Service
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 9,680
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes
I meant to type "it's for conduit", meaning that that the code proposal relates mostly only to conductors in conduit. Sometimes the brain thinks one thing and the fingers type another.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Electrician
Trade: Electrician
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 295
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Union Electrician
Trade: Inside Wireman
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,217
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed ChangesQuote:
Sorry that I'm rambling off topic. In all I can't stand that electricians who should be the only ones inside a panel have to dumb things down so an average 10 year old could figure it out, tie wrapping wires for identification, what a joke |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Union Electrician
Trade: Inside Wireman
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,217
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes
I only see reason to 'tape' your boats at junction boxes, just so adding devices later is easier.
But in your panel all the neutrals go to the same place anyway, what's the point of labeling them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Electrical Contractor
Trade: Electrical
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY State
Posts: 2,179
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes
No, not really a joke at all.
Most of my work is repeat work. So many times I am the next ten year old in there. I want to know which hots go with which neutral in case I have to remove a neutral from the bar for ANY reason.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Union Electrician
Trade: Inside Wireman
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,217
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Electrical Contractor
Trade: Electrical
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY State
Posts: 2,179
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes
Who knows?
-Move a circuit -Clean up an old panel -Service change where you need to keep the shared hots of a multi-wire circuit on different phases because some union worker used two blue wires and didn't group them with their neutral. You can question it all day. My opinion is to group my multi-wire circuits.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Union Electrician
Trade: Inside Wireman
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,217
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed ChangesQuote:
-Clean up an Old Panel- And this changes where the neutrals go somehow? And I assume the last one was just joking around, if you did find two blues on one white, I hope you traced it out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Electrical Contractor
Trade: Electrical
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY State
Posts: 2,179
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes
I know you thrive on finding fault in the things I write but why this one?
And this is not only about the neutral. But yes, sometimes you have to remove or move a neutral. I have had issues where a circuit had to be moved in a panel. With the wires not bundled how do you know which phase to put the breaker on? What if there is no open space on the same phase? How do you know which of the other two phases to put the wire on? Of course I am not talking about new work. This is in old messy panels where you need to get shyt done. In a new panel this is less of an issue. If the last guy bundled his multi-wire circuits you would have less hassle now. So now in any new work I keep my conductors grouped. Please keep doing it your way and I'll do it mine. Thank you.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Union Electrician
Trade: Inside Wireman
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,217
|
Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Feedback on a proposed company slogan | lawndart | Marketing & Sales | 26 | 06-17-2007 10:42 PM |
| New Legislation Proposed | NEPA | General Discussion | 0 | 05-07-2007 11:17 AM |
| 2008 Ford Super Duty | Dirtguy | Vehicles | 18 | 03-10-2007 12:43 PM |
| Go to Page... |
