2008 NEC Proposed Changes

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-14-2006, 10:01 PM   #1
NEC Consultant
 
JoeTedesco's Avatar
 
Trade: NEC Consultant & Instructor since 1969
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 74

2008 NEC Proposed Changes


http://magazine.iaei.org/magazine/06_d/johnston.html

JoeTedesco is offline  
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury or death. ContractorTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!

Old 09-23-2006, 11:44 PM   #2
DGR,IABD
 
mdshunk's Avatar
 
Trade: Electrical; Commercial and Residential Service
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 9,680

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


The two changes that I see that will effect me on a regular basis are:

All 15 and 20 amp branch 120 volt branch circuits will need AFCI protection. That will put an end to multi-wire branch circuits in dwellings unless I'm installing a CutlerHammer panel.

The conductors of a multiwire branch circuit need a zip-tie around them in the panel. This is stupid, but whatever.
mdshunk is offline  
Old 09-24-2006, 08:04 AM   #3
Electrical Contractor
 
Speedy Petey's Avatar
 
Trade: Electrical
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY State
Posts: 2,179

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


If the AFCI thing is passed I will be apalled! That is complete BS!
From the feedback I have been seeing it is not likely to pass. Anyone care to comment?


Marc, when using conduit I ALWAYS bundle my multi-wire circuits. Even if it is the only circuit in a conduit.
I get livid when someone doesn't and you have to go trouble shoot things.
Why are you against this?
__________________

Speedy Petey is offline  
Old 09-24-2006, 10:30 AM   #4
Pro
 
K2's Avatar
 
Trade: Licensed Colorado electrician, licensed B-1 GC
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Colorado Front Range
Posts: 2,604

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


Quote:
If the AFCI thing is passed I will be apalled! That is complete BS!
From the feedback I have been seeing it is not likely to pass. Anyone care to comment?
I heard from one of our inspectors that we were going to lose all arc fault requirements. Maybe he was talking on a local level??
K2 is offline  
Old 09-24-2006, 12:44 PM   #5
DGR,IABD
 
mdshunk's Avatar
 
Trade: Electrical; Commercial and Residential Service
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 9,680

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedy Petey View Post
Marc, when using conduit I ALWAYS bundle my multi-wire circuits. Even if it is the only circuit in a conduit.
I get livid when someone doesn't and you have to go trouble shoot things.
Why are you against this?
I'm not for conduit, but it seems to apply to NM cable also. It's a must for conduit when you have more than two neutrals in a conduit.

EDIT... now that I reread it, I see that it only applies to more than one multi wire circuit in the same conduit. I always did one of two things in that instance; bundle them like the proposal suggests, or run one set in solid and one set in stranded. I normally don't run more than 2 sets of multiwire circuits in a conduit, because you start to bump into derating concerns.

Last edited by mdshunk; 09-24-2006 at 01:03 PM.
mdshunk is offline  
Old 09-24-2006, 01:33 PM   #6
Electrical Contractor
 
Speedy Petey's Avatar
 
Trade: Electrical
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY State
Posts: 2,179

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


Quote:
Originally Posted by mdshunk View Post
I'm not for conduit, but it seems to apply to NM cable also. It's a must for conduit when you have more than two neutrals in a conduit.

EDIT... now that I reread it, I see that it only applies to more than one multi wire circuit in the same conduit. I always did one of two things in that instance; bundle them like the proposal suggests, or run one set in solid and one set in stranded. I normally don't run more than 2 sets of multiwire circuits in a conduit, because you start to bump into derating concerns.
A-haaa. I re-read it first to avoid looking dumb. Not that you look dumb Marc. Hell, I can't even see you.

Just to spark a lively debate, you do know you can run up to four sets of multi-wire circuits in a conduit before derating is a concern, don't you?
__________________

Speedy Petey is offline  
Old 09-24-2006, 01:34 PM   #7
DGR,IABD
 
mdshunk's Avatar
 
Trade: Electrical; Commercial and Residential Service
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 9,680

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedy Petey View Post
A-haaa. I re-read it first to avoid looking dumb. Not that you look dumb Marc. Hell, I can't even see you.

Just to spark a lively debate, you do know you can run up to four sets of multi-wire circuits in a conduit before derating is a concern, don't you?
3 phase? no. Single phase, yes. I think that "9" is just about the magic number.
mdshunk is offline  
Old 09-24-2006, 02:39 PM   #8
DGR,IABD
 
mdshunk's Avatar
 
Trade: Electrical; Commercial and Residential Service
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 9,680

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


From a business standpoint, I do hope the AFCI proposal passes. I'm an AFCI troubleshooting wiz, and that proposal would be fantastic for me. Until the combination type AFCI's come out, I'm not sure what benefit the present generation of AFCI's will provide.
mdshunk is offline  
Old 09-24-2006, 05:54 PM   #9
Electrical Contractor
 
Speedy Petey's Avatar
 
Trade: Electrical
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY State
Posts: 2,179

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


Quote:
Originally Posted by mdshunk View Post
3 phase? no. Single phase, yes. I think that "9" is just about the magic number.
Yes. I should have been more clear.
__________________

Speedy Petey is offline  
Old 10-04-2006, 11:50 PM   #10
Electrician
 
fridaymean's Avatar
 
Trade: Electrician
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 295

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


Quote:
Originally Posted by mdshunk View Post
I'm not for conduit

Whats wrong with conduit?

Since we have to use it, we max out our wire fill. Also, I began bundling multi circuit runs 2 or so years ago. It also helps keep the panel "clean."
fridaymean is offline  
Old 10-05-2006, 12:02 AM   #11
DGR,IABD
 
mdshunk's Avatar
 
Trade: Electrical; Commercial and Residential Service
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 9,680

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


Quote:
Originally Posted by fridaymean View Post
Whats wrong with conduit?

Since we have to use it, we max out our wire fill. Also, I began bundling multi circuit runs 2 or so years ago. It also helps keep the panel "clean."
I meant to type "it's for conduit", meaning that that the code proposal relates mostly only to conductors in conduit. Sometimes the brain thinks one thing and the fingers type another.
mdshunk is offline  
Old 10-05-2006, 07:00 PM   #12
Electrician
 
fridaymean's Avatar
 
Trade: Electrician
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 295

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


Quote:
Originally Posted by mdshunk View Post
Sometimes the brain thinks one thing and the fingers type another.

I know exactly what you are talking about.
fridaymean is offline  
Old 12-21-2006, 12:59 AM   #13
Union Electrician
 
Sparky Joe's Avatar
 
Trade: Inside Wireman
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,217

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedy Petey View Post
Marc, when using conduit I ALWAYS bundle my multi-wire circuits. Even if it is the only circuit in a conduit.
I get livid when someone doesn't and you have to go trouble shoot things.
Why are you against this?
I always keep my "multiwire" circuits consecutive, but i always assumed that's expected in commercial. Although today I pulled 2 circuits not even close to each other in the panel. Project manager had me pull a spare and said "how often do you track a neutral to it's conductors", I just said whatever, but always assumed it to craftmanlike. Justa easy to assume 7 neutrals and they would be neutral 1,3,5, neutral 7,9,11, and so on

Sorry that I'm rambling off topic.

In all I can't stand that electricians who should be the only ones inside a panel have to dumb things down so an average 10 year old could figure it out, tie wrapping wires for identification, what a joke
Sparky Joe is offline  
Old 12-21-2006, 01:13 AM   #14
Union Electrician
 
Sparky Joe's Avatar
 
Trade: Inside Wireman
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,217

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


I only see reason to 'tape' your boats at junction boxes, just so adding devices later is easier.
But in your panel all the neutrals go to the same place anyway, what's the point of labeling them.
Sparky Joe is offline  
Old 12-21-2006, 06:39 AM   #15
Electrical Contractor
 
Speedy Petey's Avatar
 
Trade: Electrical
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY State
Posts: 2,179

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


No, not really a joke at all.

Most of my work is repeat work. So many times I am the next ten year old in there.
I want to know which hots go with which neutral in case I have to remove a neutral from the bar for ANY reason.
__________________

Speedy Petey is offline  
Old 12-22-2006, 07:56 PM   #16
Union Electrician
 
Sparky Joe's Avatar
 
Trade: Inside Wireman
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,217

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedy Petey View Post
in case I have to remove a neutral from the bar for ANY reason.
Just curious what that reason may be?
Sparky Joe is offline  
Old 12-22-2006, 09:21 PM   #17
Electrical Contractor
 
Speedy Petey's Avatar
 
Trade: Electrical
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY State
Posts: 2,179

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


Who knows?
-Move a circuit
-Clean up an old panel
-Service change where you need to keep the shared hots of a multi-wire circuit on different phases because some union worker used two blue wires and didn't group them with their neutral.


You can question it all day. My opinion is to group my multi-wire circuits.
__________________

Speedy Petey is offline  
Old 12-22-2006, 09:30 PM   #18
Union Electrician
 
Sparky Joe's Avatar
 
Trade: Inside Wireman
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,217

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedy Petey View Post
Who knows?
-Move a circuit
-Clean up an old panel
-Service change where you need to keep the shared hots of a multi-wire circuit on different phases because some union worker used two blue wires and didn't group them with their neutral.
-Move a Circuit- where you gonna move the neutral to? B phase neutral bus?

-Clean up an Old Panel- And this changes where the neutrals go somehow?

And I assume the last one was just joking around, if you did find two blues on one white, I hope you traced it out.
Sparky Joe is offline  
Old 12-22-2006, 09:37 PM   #19
Electrical Contractor
 
Speedy Petey's Avatar
 
Trade: Electrical
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY State
Posts: 2,179

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


I know you thrive on finding fault in the things I write but why this one?
And this is not only about the neutral. But yes, sometimes you have to remove or move a neutral.

I have had issues where a circuit had to be moved in a panel. With the wires not bundled how do you know which phase to put the breaker on?
What if there is no open space on the same phase? How do you know which of the other two phases to put the wire on?

Of course I am not talking about new work. This is in old messy panels where you need to get shyt done. In a new panel this is less of an issue. If the last guy bundled his multi-wire circuits you would have less hassle now. So now in any new work I keep my conductors grouped.

Please keep doing it your way and I'll do it mine.
Thank you.
__________________

Speedy Petey is offline  
Old 12-22-2006, 09:49 PM   #20
Union Electrician
 
Sparky Joe's Avatar
 
Trade: Inside Wireman
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,217

Re: 2008 NEC Proposed Changes


Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedy Petey View Post
Please keep doing it your way and I'll do it mine.
Thank you.
Finally got an "uncle" out of Pete

You know I've missed seeing you around for so long, I just really gotta let you have it now
Sparky Joe is offline  


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Feedback on a proposed company slogan lawndart Marketing & Sales 26 06-17-2007 10:42 PM
New Legislation Proposed NEPA General Discussion 0 05-07-2007 11:17 AM
2008 Ford Super Duty Dirtguy Vehicles 18 03-10-2007 12:43 PM

Join Now... It's Fast and FREE!

Privacy Badge
I am a professional contractor
I am a DIY Homeowner
ContractorTalk.com is for
PROFESSIONAL CONTRACTORS ONLY!

At ContractorTalk.com we cater exlusivly to professional contractors who make their living as a contractor. Knowing that many homeowners and DIYers are looking for a community to call home, we've created www.DIYChatroom.com DIY Chatroom is full of helpful advices and perfect for DIY homeowners.

Redirecing in 10 seconds
No Thanks
terms of service

Already Have an Account?