Contractor Talk - Construction and Remodeling Site
CLICK HERE AND JOIN OUR COMMUNITY TODAY...IT'S FREE!
Go Back   Contractor Talk - Professional Construction and Remodeling Forum > Business Discussion > Business > File Swap

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-29-2009, 08:09 PM   #41
Pro
Trade: Carpenter/GC
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Boston, Mass
Posts: 291
Harvey Ind. is hosting classes (check your location) $300, I don't know if I will take that or see if other trainers offer group rates.

Taking the steps to ensure a clean work site is a good thing, but some of this sounds a bit extreme.

I have not read through the literature yet , but one thing I will be looking for is:

In my area the average house age is pushing 100+ years, so we know they have lead. What testing would be required in a case like that?
Prior to starting any work to get a base #, and after to see if you've made it worse?

I can also see this as a benefit to the contractor is some cases where it can be established that a lead issue was present before work was done, that way blame can't be placed on a contractor for a preexisting condition.

Aframe is offline   Reply With Quote
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury or death. ContractorTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!

Join Contractor Talk

Join the #1 Contractor Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

ContractorTalk.com - Are you a Professional Contractor? If so we invite you to join our community and see what it has to offer. Our site is specifically designed for you and it's the leading place for contractors to meet online. No homeowners asking DIY questions. Just fellow tradesmen who enjoy talking about their business, their trade, and anything else that comes up. No matter what your trade is you'll find that ContractorTalk.com is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally free!

Join ContractorTalk.com - Click Here JOIN FOR FREE

Old 09-29-2009, 08:31 PM   #42
Pro
 
oldfrt's Avatar
Trade: Remodeling
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northwest Connecticut
Posts: 1,136
Good to see Harvey taking a proactive stance.I'm going to look into this.

Such a drag that window replacement is included in the abatement process for a few reasons:

1)It's the dust that causes the hazard(being airborne),and there is only chips created which can be easily swept up.
Replacing the windows would eleviate any dust that may be created by just operating old DH windows.
How many kids do you see licking window sills?Duh!
2)Most of the people that are taking advantage of the energy tax credit are installing new windows.
A lot of these retrofits are for the older homes(pre 1978)
Now that market could be crushed by the new abatement rules.
3) HO's will look for less expensive ways to get the work done,hiring those that will do it without following the abatement laws.
Now that market could be crushed by the new abatement rules.
4)Insurance rates will probably rise because of the liability of dealing with lead abatement.
Probably a whole new rating system will be initiated.

We can take the tests,get approved,and only hope that there is some kind of enforcement involved to save this segment of the market.
__________________
There is no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of furnished data.Information gathered here may be for the sole purpose of entertainment.
oldfrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 05:01 AM   #43
Pro
Trade: Window and Door contractor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldfrt View Post
Good to see Harvey taking a proactive stance.I'm going to look into this.

Such a drag that window replacement is included in the abatement process for a few reasons:

1)It's the dust that causes the hazard(being airborne),and there is only chips created which can be easily swept up.
Replacing the windows would eleviate any dust that may be created by just operating old DH windows.
How many kids do you see licking window sills?Duh!
2)Most of the people that are taking advantage of the energy tax credit are installing new windows.
A lot of these retrofits are for the older homes(pre 1978)
Now that market could be crushed by the new abatement rules.
3) HO's will look for less expensive ways to get the work done,hiring those that will do it without following the abatement laws.
Now that market could be crushed by the new abatement rules.
4)Insurance rates will probably rise because of the liability of dealing with lead abatement.
Probably a whole new rating system will be initiated.

We can take the tests,get approved,and only hope that there is some kind of enforcement involved to save this segment of the market.


Yup, was reading the work requirement flow charts the other day, going to be rough.

One thing about replacement windows is we are generally in every room of the house for a very short time, I'm thinking this will easily double the time it takes to complete a job.

I talked to a couple different pm's from companies we sub for, neither had any clue about this or any upcoming changes to the way they do things.

Tell you what I am not going to be playing russian roulette with this thing, we will only work in homes built post 78 or opt out qualified unless we can get paid for all the extra time involved following the new laws.
W-Tinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 05:24 AM   #44
Member
Trade: General Contractor
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 83
I think windows will need to be done from the outside from now on. Put a piece of plastic over the inside, and then vacuum the sill when you are done. What bothers me is the testing. It appears to me that this will add another $900 per job, no matter how small (assuming more than 6 sq ft disturbed).
abacab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 11:41 AM   #45
Pro
 
JonM's Avatar
Trade: Building and Remodeling
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CONNECTICUT
Posts: 1,084
Don't put that check book away just yet...


Once you get your RRP completed course certificate, you have to submit this application for certification to the EPA...$300.00


http://www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/firmapp.pdf
JonM is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JonM For This Useful Post:
carolinahandyma (10-02-2009)
Old 09-30-2009, 12:02 PM   #46
Internet Creep
 
angus242's Avatar
Trade: Kitchen/Bath Remodeling, Tile
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Will County, Illinois
Posts: 1,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonM View Post
Don't put that check book away just yet...


Once you get your RRP completed course certificate, you have to submit this application for certification to the EPA...$300.00
Wow, I'm feeling used already.

Maybe I need to become a federally recognized tribal firm. Their fee is only $20
__________________
"If you're good at something, never do it for free."
angus242 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 12:08 PM   #47
Plausible Deniability
 
JumboJack's Avatar
Trade: General Contractor
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lakewood CA.
Posts: 2,235
Quote:
Originally Posted by angus242 View Post
Wow, I'm feeling used already.

Maybe I need to become a federally recognized tribal firm. Their fee is only $20
How?




















....
__________________
"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money."
JumboJack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 02:33 PM   #48
demo master
 
kevjob's Avatar
Trade: Remodeling General Contractor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 1,459
just signed up for my class in october. 200 for individual then 300 for firm certification both last 5 years.
kevjob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 05:40 PM   #49
Member
Trade: Remodeling
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 41
I will using the new law to sell our services by being a company that cares about the health and safety of my customers and differentiating ourselves from the the other who don't care and don't follow the rules and regulations. If the homeowner doesn't like the added costs they can go elsewhere.
I see a big problem with disclosure when anyone goes to sell a pre 1978 house that has had any kind of work done to it.
bconley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bconley For This Useful Post:
abacab (10-01-2009)
Old 10-01-2009, 07:16 PM   #50
Member
Trade: General Contractor
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 83
bconley stole my post. While I'm going to follow the regulations I'm not going to get the mandatory testing done until the law takes effect (unless if a homeowner wants it). I'm also leary of paying for a class and certification when the law could be struck down at any moment, most likely the day it is to take effect. I remember they did this with the automobile industry with mandatory testing in Michigan (maybe elsewhere?) Garages payed tens of thousands for the equipment to test vehicles and the day it was to take effect it was struck down.
abacab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 08:43 PM   #51
Pro
 
RCPainting's Avatar
Trade: Painting in Utah
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southern Utah
Posts: 621
Quote:
Originally Posted by bconley View Post
I will using the new law to sell our services by being a company that cares about the health and safety of my customers and differentiating ourselves from the the other who don't care and don't follow the rules and regulations. If the homeowner doesn't like the added costs they can go elsewhere.
I see a big problem with disclosure when anyone goes to sell a pre 1978 house that has had any kind of work done to it.
I did a bid recently on an interior/exterior of a pre 1978 home that had just been purchased. Part of the sale included a lead test report. i don't think it was required by law, or will be, but I believe the rules for disclosure and providing the pamphlet still apply to sellers/realtors.
RCPainting is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 10:38 PM   #52
Member
Trade: Remodeling
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 41
Theoretically if a potential buyer asked if any remodeling, painting etc. had been done and if the lead rules had been followed the seller would have to disclose that by law.
If the rules were not adhered to, the buyer could ask for concessions or worse a law suit if any known issues were not disclosed.
The lead paint testing is just to see if there is lead paint present.
My understanding is that if it is encapsulated with another coat of paint it is OK, it is the disturbing during prep or demo that is the problem, much like asbestos.
bconley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 10:48 PM   #53
Chief Toilet Mover
 
Mike Finley's Avatar
Trade: Bathroom Remodeling
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Littleton, Colorado
Posts: 11,758
Why would there be an issue to a new buyer if remodeling had been done years earlier and whether these rules were followed or not?

It's all about the dust being released into the air at the time of remodeling isn't it? It isn't like you are releasing radioactive matter that will contaminate the house right?
Mike Finley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 11:10 PM   #54
Member
Trade: Remodeling
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 41
I understand that it shouldn't be a concern, but when did common sense ever matter when the lawyers get involved?
If there is something in the laws that can be leveraged it will.
bconley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 05:57 AM   #55
Remodel & Handyman Servic
Trade: Remodel and Handyman Services
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 129
The actual EPA rules of this program are likely to get tougher going forward as the Sierra Club and other organizations have taken legal action against the EPA.

From the Sierra Club website--Improving the Lead Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule (RRP)

In an effort to protect more children from the threat of lead poisoning in their homes, the Sierra Club settled a legal challenge brought last year against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with a commitment by the agency to fix flaws in its recent lead in renovation rule that could have jeopardized children's health. The result of this work is that the US EPA will address several shortcomings prior to the rule's effective date of April 22, 2010, add additional safeguards by July 2011, and expand the scope of the rule to public and commercial buildings over the next six years. A great success for kids' health nationwide. See more at http://www.sierraclub.org/communities/lead/default.aspx






Bath and kitchen remodel serving Durham Chapel Hill and Raleigh North Carolina




Start and build a handyman home improvement business
carolinahandyma is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lead service providers: Beware! We were FOOLED. Stonewood Online Leads Services 5 11-03-2009 02:26 PM
What Internet lead services should do to corner the market Mike Finley Business 44 08-11-2009 08:52 PM
Lead production companies PROJECTHR Online Leads Services 6 03-16-2009 09:23 AM
lead safe windo replacement PreferredResto General Discussion 2 12-01-2008 11:46 AM




Top of Page | View New Posts


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 PM.


Contractor Talk™ © 2003 - 2009 The Building Network LLC