|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Trade: Carpentry
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Easton, PA
Posts: 38
|
Transit On Slopes
I know the method of laying out a building with a transit. Plumb over point, shoot the other reference point, then swing a 90, repeat, etc... Pathag-theory. But this seems to only work with level grades. What happens when laying out a building and ground slopes, and slopes a lot. Does this method still work? Any good online reads on this very topic - OR - does someone care to explain it to me?
![]() Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Pro
Trade: Excavation Contractor
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 374
|
Re: Transit On Slopes
Pythagorean still works on slopes........the trick is that your slope is is the hypotenuse. Use your transit/laser to figure out your height difference, plug in your required footprint dimension, and that will give you the distance needed along the slope/hypotenuse. Across the slope would not apply since the plane of reference is the same as normal. As I write this it is becoming apparent that I need a stick and a nice patch of sand to draw this out. Point being, if you understand the pythagorean theorem, then you will be able to manipulate it to figure out your footprint on the slope. Good luck
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Trade: Carpentry
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Easton, PA
Posts: 38
|
Re: Transit On SlopesQuote:
Any insight on what you would do id the ground went up, then down, then up, then down (you get the picture) - really uneven and all over the place...? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Contractor
Trade: Excavation, Foundation, Concrete
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,276
|
Re: Transit On Slopes
What is the difference in elevation total?
I'll use a plumb bob or an eight foot level to drop the point down to grade. If it gets to be too much....the heck with it, let the builder hire a surveyor to do the layout. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Pro
Trade: Excavation Contractor
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 374
|
Re: Transit On SlopesQuote:
"Bumpy Ground" definately poses a problem. My method works well from an excavator's standpoint since I will over dig, get flat and then nail everything down precisely with the newly prepared surface. If you are trying to build on the existing surface, then TGEB's method would work better. Another trick would be to go oldschool with batter boards, a string level, plumb bob, and tape. Point being, uneven terrain posess challenges to getting your footprint dead on without any surface prep. If the ground isn't too "bumpy", You can pull everything up say 1' to clear all obstructions, subtract that foot from your original height difference. Using stakes and a plumb bob for a one foot drop would be darn close if not right on. I am sure I just made it more confusing, but let me know if you want me to try and clear up my thought process |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Trade: Carpentry
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Easton, PA
Posts: 38
|
Re: Transit On SlopesQuote:
Thanks (everyone) for you help. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Curmudgeon
Trade: carpentry/remodeling/"Yes M'am we do"
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beech Grove, Indiana, Birthplace of the "King of Cool"
Posts: 11,707
|
Re: Transit On Slopes
You might be interested in this.
http://www.ce.memphis.edu/1101/notes...g_distance.pdf -
__________________
Put your location in your profile! (Sorry....it seems there really are dumb questions) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Using A Transit To Determine Height | bradjacob | Excavation & Site Work | 23 | 08-29-2010 01:23 AM |
| Mowing slopes | macpond | Landscaping | 3 | 03-30-2008 01:59 PM |
| interesting transit connect | Bone Saw | Vehicles | 1 | 03-15-2008 08:16 PM |
| transit level for deck posts | lemoncoke | Decks & Fencing | 23 | 08-30-2007 06:15 PM |
| Go to Page... |
