 |
07-17-2009, 04:14 PM
|
#1
|
|
Pro
Trade:
contracts/negotiations
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 170
|
24,000 BTU Ruud package unit, 40oz vs 70oz R-22
I just noticed that a 24kcool/75kheat unit from 1990 has a factory charge of 40 oz where as an adjacent 2007 unit with 24k/60k capacity has a factory charge of 70oz. They're both running R-22.
They're both Ruud units. Why does the newer design use almost twice as much refrigerant? Is it a reserve to allow for more leak before needing service??
|
|
|
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury
or death. ContractorTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!
Join the #1 Contractor Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
ContractorTalk.com - Are you a Professional Contractor? If so we invite you to join our community and see what it has to offer. Our site is specifically designed for you and it's the leading place for contractors to meet online. No homeowners asking DIY questions. Just fellow tradesmen who enjoy talking about their business, their trade, and anything else that comes up. No matter what your trade is you'll find that ContractorTalk.com is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally free!
Join ContractorTalk.com - Click Here

|
07-17-2009, 05:25 PM
|
#2
|
|
NICKTECH
Trade:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Union NJ
Posts: 215
|
the 1990 is probably a 9 or 10 seer. the 2007 must be a minimum of 13 seer as of '06. the higher the efficiency the larger the coils need to be. with the larger coils comes more space to fill up with refrigerant. 
BTW, units are charged with the exact amount of refrig needed to operate, not "with a lil extra in case of leaks"
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to NickTech For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-17-2009, 06:34 PM
|
#3
|
|
Pro
Trade:
contracts/negotiations
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 170
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickTech
the 1990 is probably a 9 or 10 seer. the 2007 must be a minimum of 13 seer as of '06. the higher the efficiency the larger the coils need to be. with the larger coils comes more space to fill up with refrigerant. 
BTW, units are charged with the exact amount of refrig needed to operate, not "with a lil extra in case of leaks" 
|
Ah, that makes sense. The 2007 unit is MUCH bigger physically too.
I'm guessing package units are much less prone to leaks and perform more consistently since you don't have techs doing the pipe brazing and there is no technician discretion in using the gauges and measuring temperatures to charge. I read somewhere that overcharge is quite a common problem with a split system.
So, am I correct to think that the best way to have a package unit charge is to have it evacuated, then filled to factory spec by weight just like on automotive system?
|
|
|
07-17-2009, 07:46 PM
|
#4
|
|
Pro
Trade:
H.v.a.c.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Boise, Id
Posts: 549
|
Overcharging does happen. But most outfits check out the charge before leaving the job. If they charged the system via super-heat, sub cool, they should be alright. You can weigh in the charge as explained, but bottom line is you want a certain level of SH, and the compressor should be drawing X amount of Amps.
Actually, it's better to not mess with the charge unless there are problems with the cooling system.
|
|
|
07-17-2009, 08:39 PM
|
#5
|
|
Pro
Trade:
contracts/negotiations
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 170
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flashheatingand
Overcharging does happen. But most outfits check out the charge before leaving the job. If they charged the system via super-heat, sub cool, they should be alright. You can weigh in the charge as explained, but bottom line is you want a certain level of SH, and the compressor should be drawing X amount of Amps.
Actually, it's better to not mess with the charge unless there are problems with the cooling system.
|
Well, the system is 20 years old, so I'm pretty sure it's lost some charge, so I'm tempted to have it evacuated then, recharged by weight. It's probably got some acid built up too.
|
|
|
07-18-2009, 07:18 PM
|
#6
|
|
NICKTECH
Trade:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Union NJ
Posts: 215
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electric_Light
Well, the system is 20 years old, so I'm pretty sure it's lost some charge, so I'm tempted to have it evacuated then, recharged by weight. It's probably got some acid built up too.
|
not so fast. i've worked on old r12 chrysler airtemp a/c systems frm the 50's w/o leaks. and split systems over 20 yrs old with the original charge. ya cant assume anything, proper test methods with tell you exactly what the system is doing and what the charge is. and acid is only formed when moisture enters the system and makes hydrochloric and hydrofloric acid. an acid test kit will prove so.
|
|
|
07-18-2009, 11:31 PM
|
#7
|
|
Pro
Trade:
H.v.a.c.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Boise, Id
Posts: 549
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electric_Light
Well, the system is 20 years old, so I'm pretty sure it's lost some charge, so I'm tempted to have it evacuated then, recharged by weight. It's probably got some acid built up too.
|
You risk awaking a sleeping giant. If the system has been fine for 20 years, don't mess with the charge. Want to get the most life out of the appliance? Just keep the coils clean, get the dust off the motors,and make sure the condensate drains alright.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|