|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 |
|
Pro
Trade: Plumbing & Electrical
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,195
|
Re: Cat5e For PhoneLMAO.....Her People...haaaahaaa |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
New Guy
Trade: Electrical Contractor
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8
|
Re: Cat5e For Phone
There is nothing more retarded than running Cat 6 in a house.
Last edited by Gaius Baltar; 02-24-2007 at 12:35 PM. Reason: Spelling |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
DGR,IABD
Trade: Electrical; Commercial and Residential Service
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 9,680
|
Re: Cat5e For Phone |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Thom
Trade: General Contractor/Homebuilder
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 3,197
|
Re: Cat5e For Phone
Do any of you have real-life experience with combining phone (1 or 2 lines) with a network on cat 5-E? I've been told by "experts" that it will work fine and other "experts" that the phone will corrupt the network communication. Since the "experts" disagree, I'm wondering if anyone has actually tested this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
DGR,IABD
Trade: Electrical; Commercial and Residential Service
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 9,680
|
Re: Cat5e For PhoneQuote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
Pro
Trade: Low Voltage
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Burlington, Ontario
Posts: 1,330
|
Re: Cat5e For PhoneQuote:
I have no quad/cat3 running in my house for phones at all. I just patch the cat6 ports into the phone system and away I go. A constant work in progress: http://www.phonejacks.ca/images/setup-1-full.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
New Guy
Trade: Electrical Contractor
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8
|
Re: Cat5e For PhoneQuote:
At the risk of insulting you and your sensitive friends, installing Cat 6 in a house is retarded. Last edited by Gaius Baltar; 02-24-2007 at 11:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
New Guy
Trade: Electrical Contractor
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8
|
Re: Cat5e For PhoneQuote:
Assuming 10BaseT or 100BaseT, this installation would work but would have problems you would probably never know about. For example, when an analog phone rings, it will create enough CROSSTALK to wash out the ethernet protocol on the adjacent pairs. This would slow down data transfer but would probably not be noticed. IT would work, no doubt about it, but it's a bad practice because if they upgrade to 1000BaseT, they will then need all four pairs and your phone lines will prevent that upgrade. Your idea about smuggling the phone lines in with the data is actually a pretty common practice. Sometimes ya gotta do what ya gotta do, but just realize that your network does not comply with any standards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
New Guy
Trade: Electrical Contractor
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8
|
Re: Cat5e For PhoneQuote:
Just installing a cable with "Cat 6" printed on the jacket does not make it a Cat 6 network. And if your not going to really install a Cat 6 network, why buy Cat 6 cable? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Registered User
Trade: Low Voltage installation
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8
|
Re: Cat5e For Phone
I know that I may be late here with information in regards to the "daisy chain" however I feel I must reply. The biggest reason that you do not daisy chain phones is that in the event one jack or the "out line" has an issue all jacks following that one will no longer work. Daisy chaining will only cause problems for you the installer, home owner and any future tecnician. You done the right thing by taking out the daisy chain in te coax. I recommend installing atleast 2 coax cables in the LR, MB and bonus room. All other romms should be ok with just one coax. If you install 2 in the above locations then the home owner has great options for Directv, Dish Network and cable due to some of these receivers are requiring two coax inputs.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cat5e cable | JasontheMason | Low Voltage | 16 | 03-14-2007 11:16 PM |
| Go to Page... |
