|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Drywaller for Hire
Trade: Drywall/Interior Finish
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 44
|
MR Vs. "Regular" Rock
Okay, so almost everyone in my area will use MR in the bathroom....but according to a previous thread, it's of no use and may even be detrimental to the longevity of the bathroom? Is this correct? Can someone point me to some info that supports this? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?
__________________
~a HAVE TOOLS, WILL TRAVEL |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Pro
Trade: REMODELING CONTRACTOR
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Port Orchard,WA
Posts: 139
|
Re: MR Vs. "Regular" Rock
That thread was news to me also. Around here,their still requiring the green stuff for wet area's unless covered by a surround.
Steve Unkie. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| One more rock job | Nac | Excavation & Site Work | 7 | 05-13-2007 09:14 PM |
| Rock Clause In Contract | Driftwood | Excavation & Site Work | 9 | 03-15-2007 09:42 PM |
| Rock / No Rock | denick | Excavation & Site Work | 11 | 02-13-2007 09:59 PM |
| dug footer for deck, monster rock in one. | ramblemn | Construction | 7 | 06-06-2006 12:18 AM |
| Rock splitting | denick | Excavation & Site Work | 7 | 04-30-2006 07:21 PM |
| Go to Page... |
