1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-08-2009, 12:51 AM   #1
Pro
 
jtpro's Avatar
 
Trade: Construction Assistant Superintendant/Remodeler
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 1,154

1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


Funny when you're part of more than one forum you tend to think they operate simular. I posted the following in a truck forum don't know how much help I'll get so I hope Ya'll can be more enlightening.:

I posted a thread before about moding vs. getting what you want up front. GOOD ADVICE. Going with my gut and getting up front needs as opposed to costly “after the facts”.

So here is where I need Ya’lls help.

I have my truck selections down to either a ’98 Chevy 1500 Z71 EXT cab step side short box or 2000 Chevy 1500 Z71 EXT cab step side short box.

These comparisons are based on what little research I have been able to do PLEASE feel free to correct any and all inaccuracies.

I LOVE the look of the ’98. Test drove one and it was “me”. Down side only a three door.

00’ has the earliest 4 door but downside electronic 4X4. Thought that was cool but seems people have more probs with that then a floor shifter with “hard parts”.

Now I’ve come to terms if the nod goes to the ’00 the box can possibly be swapped with perseverance.

NOT a deal breaker one way or the other.

I am unsure of how the power plants compare as to MPI,TBI etc.

I am also unsure of the factory drive train comparison in both. It seems more pro ’98 then anti ’98 or pro/anti ’00.

If both are weak by 4X4 standards are drive train upgrades (differentials, tranny ,transfer case) one sided or equally easy/difficult?

Which one if either has the easiest and or lesser expensive body and suspension lift kits.

I do have a list from a review forum of what breaks down at what miles but any personal experience on that would be great too.

Hope my book wasn’t too boring just trying to get more info up front.

ANY and ALL pros/cons from people who have owned one or the other, both or just know a ShT load about bowties would be GREATLY appreciated.

jtpro is offline  
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury or death. ContractorTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!

Old 08-08-2009, 01:34 AM   #2
LET ME SHOW YA SOMETHIN!!
 
CrpntrFrk's Avatar
 
Trade: I do that too!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Globe, Arizona
Posts: 1,409

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


I dont know a sh!t load about bowties except that they are a sh!t load.
Sorry ......i will shut up know for screwing up your thread.
__________________
DO IT!! DO IT!! DO IT!!
CrpntrFrk is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 02:03 AM   #3
Yard Boi
 
HusqyPro's Avatar
 
Trade: Landscaping
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Genesee, ID
Posts: 440

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


The 88 to 98 trucks seem to be holding their value very well. I'd go with the 98, take care of it, and enjoy decent resale when it comes time to sell.
__________________
Bob's Lawn & Landscape
When You Want The Best
Serving the LC Valley & Moscow-Pullman
HusqyPro is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to HusqyPro For This Useful Post:
jtpro (08-08-2009)
Old 08-08-2009, 07:29 AM   #4
Pro
 
jtpro's Avatar
 
Trade: Construction Assistant Superintendant/Remodeler
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 1,154

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


Quote:
Originally Posted by CrpntrFrk View Post
I dont know a sh!t load about bowties except that they are a sh!t load.
Sorry ......i will shut up know for screwing up your thread.
NO PROB

My best freind likes Ford so we go back and forth. Another likes Dodge.
jtpro is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 08:54 AM   #5
Contractor
 
72chevy4x4's Avatar
 
Trade: Remodeling & Home Additions
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Delaware
Posts: 2,434

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


the 98 has the older vortec 5.7 and the 00 s/h the 5.3. the older years offered 'electronic' 4x4 actuation-but also offered the manual 4x4 lever. common problems w/ 5.7 vortec engine included a leaking intake gasket and defective fuel pressure regulator. In order to change out the FPR, the intake (top) has to come out, so if it needs fixing, do both and use factory GM parts. I can't comment on any 5.3 problems...seems like the mileage may be a bit better, but probably not by much.

no problems w/ the older drivetrain if you take care of it-keep up with the diff's fluid (actually check it). sometimes the tranny's go out around the 120k mark-but I've got 140k on my suburban w/ no problems. one thing I picked up a long time ago was an electronic shift device-it's easy to wire and by switching the button you can choose normal, tow or street-it firms the shift point or lockup of the tranny (not sure)-but shifts more firmly which probalby keeps tranny temps down when towing. no need to mess with it during regular driving, but if towing something heavy it would help.
72chevy4x4 is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 09:52 AM   #6
Pro
 
jtpro's Avatar
 
Trade: Construction Assistant Superintendant/Remodeler
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 1,154

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


THANKS!

More info than any one is willing to share on a "TRUCK" forum!

The probs you stated are in the review.

One '98 I saw had the tranny rebuilt figured that was a already a plus.

Also upon getting the truck I plan on BUMPER to BUMPER fluid flushes/changes, FI "flush" , Bosch Platinum Spark plugs (possibly wires) and K&N filter. Flowmasters and tires(if not needed sooner) later.

Learned long ago functionality before bells and whistles.

Last edited by jtpro; 08-08-2009 at 09:55 AM.
jtpro is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 10:54 AM   #7
Tech Geek
 
WarriorWithWood's Avatar
 
Trade: Property Management/Facilities Manager
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Feasterville, Pa.
Posts: 1,431

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


Go with the 98, the 00 has a class action lemon law going on it.

http://www.lemonlaw.com/gm-engine-problem.html
__________________
-Dennis
www.bowmanch.com
WarriorWithWood is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 11:42 AM   #8
Pro
 
mmike032's Avatar
 
Trade: trim carpentry
Join Date: May 2007
Location: south ga
Posts: 710

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


fullsizechevy.com has a wealth of info on chevys. I frequented that site before getting my lift kit.

I had a '96 before getting a '07NBS a couple years ago.
only problems out of the '96 was an AC compressor going out and the intake gasket like stated. cost about $250 to get the gasket replaced.
mmike032 is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 12:07 PM   #9
Pro
 
jtpro's Avatar
 
Trade: Construction Assistant Superintendant/Remodeler
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 1,154

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


WOW!!!! Thanks warrior! I just REALLY wanted the 4 door. Oh well.

And you too Mike!

AGAIN so funny on how a NON truck specific forum reaps (NOT RAPE!)me more useful knowledge then a truck only!

Last edited by jtpro; 08-08-2009 at 12:24 PM.
jtpro is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 01:42 PM   #10
Yard Boi
 
HusqyPro's Avatar
 
Trade: Landscaping
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Genesee, ID
Posts: 440

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


Another thing about the older GM's. The 5.7 was basically unchanged from 1957 to around 98. So parts are plentiful and less expensive. The 283 to 350 engine family is really widespread, every mechanic in the US is familiar with the design.
__________________
Bob's Lawn & Landscape
When You Want The Best
Serving the LC Valley & Moscow-Pullman
HusqyPro is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 01:58 PM   #11
Pro
 
jtpro's Avatar
 
Trade: Construction Assistant Superintendant/Remodeler
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 1,154

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


Quote:
Originally Posted by HusqyPro View Post
Another thing about the older GM's. The 5.7 was basically unchanged from 1957 to around 98. So parts are plentiful and less expensive. The 283 to 350 engine family is really widespread, every mechanic in the US is familiar with the design.
I always hated the ___.____ shiz. So is a 5.3 a 305 or 327 and a 5.7 is a 350?

Tell me it's a damn 350 I know I can morph it into a 383 or swap it out with a 400 small block .

Then they started with vortec this blah blah that. I don't mind TPI or other forms of "modern" tech ( well not that TPI is all THAT 'modern') it just gets overwheming to see through the hype and when it gets to where I have to go to a mech. to fix little crap I get frustrated.

I mean damn I'm alergic to vaseline! and what's worse is sometmes they charge extra or offer NONE at all!
jtpro is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 02:08 PM   #12
Yard Boi
 
HusqyPro's Avatar
 
Trade: Landscaping
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Genesee, ID
Posts: 440

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


Short answer:
If it has a V-8 and was built before 1998 with a displacement 400 cubic inches or smaller chances are it's part of the same engine family.

Long answer:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrol...l-block_engine

305 is a destroked 350.

5.3 is a different engine family.
__________________
Bob's Lawn & Landscape
When You Want The Best
Serving the LC Valley & Moscow-Pullman
HusqyPro is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 06:31 PM   #13
Pro
 
jtpro's Avatar
 
Trade: Construction Assistant Superintendant/Remodeler
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 1,154

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


Quote:
Originally Posted by HusqyPro View Post
Short answer:
If it has a V-8 and was built before 1998 with a displacement 400 cubic inches or smaller chances are it's part of the same engine family.

Long answer:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrol...l-block_engine

305 is a destroked 350.

5.3 is a different engine family.
Thanx husqy! For some reason I don't have Wikepedia on my computer.

LOL I ALWAYS head to a forum and sometimes forget where and how to look on my own!

You know there was another poster on here much like you. A good post a laugh, good info whatever. Sadly for us Bob (was his name) left for the caymens where he now heads up the corporate offices of Bobslandscaping.

He will be missed but I think you are a good fit in his absence!
jtpro is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 06:39 PM   #14
Grand Rapids Remodeling
 
Paulie's Avatar
 
Trade: Remodeling Contractor
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, MI.
Posts: 2,339

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


Quote:
Originally Posted by jtpro View Post
Thanx husqy! For some reason I don't have Wikepedia on my computer.

LOL I ALWAYS head to a forum and sometimes forget where and how to look on my own!

You know there was another poster on here much like you. A good post a laugh, good info whatever. Sadly for us Bob (was his name) left for the caymens where he now heads up the corporate offices of Bobslandscaping.

He will be missed but I think you are a good fit in his absence!
I just had a IRS agent PM me asking about this Bob guy. Now I can tell him where to look.
Paulie is online now  
Old 08-08-2009, 07:01 PM   #15
Pro
 
jtpro's Avatar
 
Trade: Construction Assistant Superintendant/Remodeler
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 1,154

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


Quote:
Originally Posted by paulie View Post
I just had a IRS agent PM me asking about this Bob guy. Now I can tell him where to look.
Funny thing Bob PM'd me after I posted that he had moved to Argentina. Seems some of his relatives live there from when they "migrated" there from Gemany in the mid to late '40's. Don't know why the left Germany never asked.
jtpro is offline  
Old 08-09-2009, 04:57 PM   #16
Pro
 
W-Tinc's Avatar
 
Trade: Student
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Northern Wi
Posts: 291

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


Does the newer one have four wheel disc brakes? Thats a big deal for me, I pull a 6x12 trailer alot and notice a big difference stopping.
W-Tinc is offline  
Old 08-09-2009, 05:58 PM   #17
Tech Geek
 
WarriorWithWood's Avatar
 
Trade: Property Management/Facilities Manager
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Feasterville, Pa.
Posts: 1,431

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


If you're pulling a trailer, I'd recommend looking for the 4L-80E or the Allison trans too. The 4L-60E (much more common)won't cut the mustard for too long if you're doing heavy pulling.
__________________
-Dennis
www.bowmanch.com
WarriorWithWood is offline  
Old 08-13-2009, 11:15 PM   #18
Pro
 
jtpro's Avatar
 
Trade: Construction Assistant Superintendant/Remodeler
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 1,154

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


Thanks W-tink and Warrior never thought that far ahead as to discs or towing.

I was looking more as solid daily driver with NO "major" probs just up keep.

As the truck starts "earning me money" I hope to make investments back into it or at least have a truck fund for "what ifs".

But thanks to your points I can add that to the comparison list.
jtpro is offline  
Old 09-02-2009, 09:19 AM   #19
Pro
 
Red Adobe's Avatar
 
Trade: Siding, Metal Roofs, and Beer Drinking PRO
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Eastern NM / West Tx
Posts: 215

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


All I own is chevys, my next project is a duramax/allison retrofitted into a 96 5.7 1 ton with the old body. Im just waiting for someone to total a duramax localy

The thing to look at is how much will you be using the backseat,

The 98 will have a better ride and towing then the 00 or newer.

the 5.3 is ok but the 5.7 is a better tried and true engine (better flowing exhuast is a must ) inho
Yah Im the guy who wakes up the neighborhood when i take off in the mornin lol
Red Adobe is offline  
Old 09-03-2009, 03:47 PM   #20
Pro
 
joshua1's Avatar
 
Trade: General Contractor
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 105

Re: 1998 Z71 Vs. 2000 Z71


Is any work truck or van built since 99 any good? 00 seems to be a watershed, after which electronics really took hold, and effed up pretty much every wagon. Pre 00 fords, pretty good, post 00, scrap. Pre 99 mercs= diamonds, 00 onwards- coal slag. I have 2008 work vans and they are a pain - all faults are electronic and have to go to the dealer. I have an old 99 ford we use as a service van, and it never misses a beat. I'd buy the 98.
joshua1 is offline  


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
p 2000 insulation Dr Heat Insulation 44 02-24-2010 11:47 PM
Senco 2000 ? klucrezi Tools & Equipment 5 12-19-2009 03:34 PM
Just bought a (new 2 me) 2000 Ford Ranger XL, 175k Miles, What to do next? timtim2008 Vehicles 17 01-19-2009 04:44 PM
Autocad 2000 and xp reveivl Technology 3 08-15-2006 11:28 AM
2000 Ford E-350 Work Van cumminsdsl Contractor Swap 3 07-14-2006 09:10 PM

Join Now... It's Fast and FREE!

Privacy Badge
I am a professional contractor
I am a DIY Homeowner
ContractorTalk.com is for
PROFESSIONAL CONTRACTORS ONLY!

At ContractorTalk.com we cater exlusivly to professional contractors who make their living as a contractor. Knowing that many homeowners and DIYers are looking for a community to call home, we've created www.DIYChatroom.com DIY Chatroom is full of helpful advices and perfect for DIY homeowners.

Redirecing in 10 seconds
No Thanks
terms of service

Already Have an Account?