|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#61 |
|
Pro
Trade: General Contractor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hennessey, Oklahoma
Posts: 6,057
|
Re: ICF Home
The trusses are secured with "hurricane clips" to the top plate (2X12) and it is J bolted in the concrete at roughly 6 feet on center. I haven't even thought about uplift, but the actual overhangs are 6 feet by 56, so 336 X the factor for an 80 mile an hour wind works here...and without getting out the books, I do not remember the percentage factor.
The solar gaurd we are installing under the metal panels claims a factor of R3...but the foil facing up is the effect we are after, not the R value. The reflective value is claimed to be higher then 50%, and from my experience, can make the attic 40 degrees cooler in the summer. We will blow in an R60 cellulose attic fill. The projected cost to heat and cool this home will be .03 cents a sq/ft per month. I would not hesitate to do a metal truss system on ICFs, and I would imagine it would well exceed code for coastal areas. The University of Texas has tested the ICF block system used here (BuildBlock) and it withstands all they can shoot at it.
__________________
Ladwig Construction Hennessey, Oklahoma 405 853 1563 Ladwig Insulation & Construction Services Serving Oklahoma Statewide
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Pro
Trade: HVAC Contractor/ General Contractor
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: West Palm Florida
Posts: 145
|
Re: ICF Home
Thanks for the info, I am used to concrete block and tie beam construction, the Build block just looks like a real clean building system, I have not seen it before, very interesting.
Good luck with the rest of the build. |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Pro
Trade: Masonry consultant
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MSP, Minnesota
Posts: 2,449
|
Re: ICF Home
Joasis -
I tried to find the University of Texas test reports on the BuildBlock site. Did they conduct separate tests for BuildBlock or did they just tag on the tests for the normal 6" walls? I understand there may be some very, very localized Florida projectile requiremnts and would like to see if the tests were run for those areas. A flat plate on an anchor bolt will give you even more uplift reisistance than a J bolt. Maybe not needed since the roof would fail first anyway.
__________________
Dick Engineer, designer and consultant recently active domestically and internationally on construction and design in about 35 countries. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
Pro
Trade: General Contractor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hennessey, Oklahoma
Posts: 6,057
|
Re: ICF HomeQuote:
I am actually unsure of whether BUILDBLOCK was tested by UofT, but the testing they did on ICF with 6 inch fill was completed a few years back, as Reward wall reps love to talk about, and of course, the 2X4 at 200+ MPH shattered without even cracking the concrete. We actually pulled a J bolt out of the top of the wall pulling a bowed plate down.....next one of these I do, I will use a grade 5 bolt with 1/4 inch washers....no way it will come out, and like you pointed out, the roof would fail first. Had I been building this as a spec (my money), I would have used weld plates with concrete hooks placed on the walls for steel trusses to be welded down to......
__________________
Ladwig Construction Hennessey, Oklahoma 405 853 1563 Ladwig Insulation & Construction Services Serving Oklahoma Statewide
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Pro
Trade: Masonry consultant
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MSP, Minnesota
Posts: 2,449
|
Re: ICF Home
It sounds like Buildblock was using the Reward test results. I can get the Reward test results somewhere to see what the steel size and spacing was.
I have seen the tests run. - Looks like it must have been fun shooting the 2x4s. From what I remeber, the amount of reinforcement and spacing is more important for the 6" walls than the 8". Any way you cut it, you would 4 to 10 wood walls together to match the protection.
__________________
Dick Engineer, designer and consultant recently active domestically and internationally on construction and design in about 35 countries. |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Registered User
Trade: Lic Commercial General Contractor, ICF and Structural Concrete
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3
|
Re: ICF Home
Sorry I'm so late in the game with a question, but new to the site today. GREAT PROJECT!! Just wondering why you placed the bracing system on the exterior? It is usually harder to manage in the dirt, than on the concrete slab.
Greg |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Pro
Trade: General Contractor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hennessey, Oklahoma
Posts: 6,057
|
Re: ICF Home
I prefer the exterior bracing simply because we can use a baker scaffold rolled around the interior while pumping and working....no walkboards.
As soon as I get my software uploaded, I will post the current pics....the brick is nearly done, and the cabs are getting stained now, the acid stained floors are top sealed......next will be the concrete countertops.
__________________
Ladwig Construction Hennessey, Oklahoma 405 853 1563 Ladwig Insulation & Construction Services Serving Oklahoma Statewide
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Member
Trade: Commercial GC
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 41
|
Re: ICF Home |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Pro
Trade: General Contractor
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 243
|
Re: ICF Home
With all the wind from tornados you do not have to use full roof sheathing? That seems weak but I been having to use full sheating for the last 15 years hear on the east coast. Has any one used the block made of foam agrigate concrete. They go togeather like regular block but come in the longer lengths(4') and cut with a hand saw. Saw them in a show once but never again? Here in FL I'd worry the termites would tunnel right throught the foam? Looks great thanks for posting the photos
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Registered User
Trade: builder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1
|
Re: ICF Home
Hello has anyone here used reinforced glass rods in the poured concrete vs metal rods? I understand that some bridge designers are using the glass because many bridges have suffered from the corrosion of the metal rods against the poured concrete? Also I would appreciate a source for these rods (preferably in west europe or east cost usa) as I can only find them in china.
Also, I'd like to solicit comments about icf design and reinforcement near a railway. The current solid brick (ie. 2ft thick in some places) structure in question that we are building an addition onto is a 120 yr old dwelling for station masters which abuts the railway platform. The structure receives some huge vibrations that resonate throughout the floor and walls when a railway track stamping machine comes by approx 1ce a quarter, or when high speed trains go by (maybe 2x per day). Specifically, is icf suitable for a basement about 3 ft from the platform, and how to deal with the footings of the existing structure as there are no records as to how it was built. thanks for your comments and I hope this thread is seen |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Dmax Consulting
Trade: Paint Contractor
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 84
|
Re: ICF Home
What's ICF mean?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Pro
Trade: Masonry consultant
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MSP, Minnesota
Posts: 2,449
|
Re: ICF Home
ICF means Insulating Concrete Forms.
Alternates would be - 1. Reinforced block (the "forms" - block) are load bearing and are left in place. The wall is designed just like a reinforced concrete wall, except only the cores with rebar are filled, although all cores could be filled if it is easier. - Same strength potential as reinforced concrete. Insulation, if desired is applied when desired. 2. Reinforced concrete with the wood or aluminum forms removed after the concrete is strong enough. Like ICFs, the concrete muct not be too wet or you could/would end up with shrinkage cracks. Insulation, if desired is applied when desired. An advantage of ICFs is the insulating value of the forms left in place. A disadvantage is the forms are bought and paid for and usually left in place even if insualtion is not wanted or justified. The construction "carbon foot print" (energy in production) for ICFs is greater than for either block or poured concrete because the forms are made and left in place and not reused. Most ICF walls have a 6" concrete core, which means the wall thickness must be increased to be equivalant 8" poured wall, unless you are comparing to a 6" poured wall. Both the concrete block and poured walls are exposed after construction, so any construction defects can repaired early, when it is easier. ICF walls are not exposed (the structural portion) is never seen so there is no opportunity to view thw quality of construction.
__________________
Dick Engineer, designer and consultant recently active domestically and internationally on construction and design in about 35 countries. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Proposals...... | AAPaint | Painting & Finish Work | 3 | 08-25-2007 09:47 AM |
| Investing in a home | ButlerDesigns | Business | 17 | 07-13-2007 01:11 PM |
| Set up at a Home Show Today... | Max10 | General Discussion | 16 | 10-18-2006 04:03 PM |
| Chicago Home Repair License? | Grumpy | Contractor Licensing | 24 | 09-15-2006 12:48 AM |
| Drug caches found in Home Depot vanities | HandyAl | General Discussion | 1 | 06-14-2006 08:14 PM |
| Go to Page... |
