ContractorTalk Court...:thumbsup:_vs_painterjim

Tom R

Hmm, - - would that be considered 'big cock' country, then??

P.S. Great investigative work, Zatol!!

__________________
http://www.tr-built.com

painterjim

That's good stuff....very creative! Some would say slick. But thats what you do isn't it Mr P? You gloss over the truth, and speak like silk. You are paid good money to make this go away. Last night you were seen in the chat room attempting to sway the jury. The Contractor Talk community however are not fooled by this schmoozing, they see the truth for what it is. Isn't it true that Thumb sup has a twin brother, could the skiing photo not be his brother?

I will conclude now with three simple facts, then we shall let the truffles fall where they may.

FACT 1. Thumbs up was at the scene of the crime, his thumb print was all over the reply.

FACT2. I didn't have the required numbers of post to submit a smiley, when I back spaced to remedy the error, my post was gone...coincidence...i think not.

FACT3. I ask the members of the jury, are you going to believe the word of two of the most vile,vicious,nauseating,unscrupulous,mean,underhan ded members of The Truffle Haters of America. Or will you believe the man who by good faith tried to answer a question in depth and was rewarded with the theft of said reply??

I will now ask Jury Foreman Tom R to recess with the contractor talk community, and find thumbsup and Mr P guilty as charged. Thank You

Double-A

I hate to do it, but I think I'm going to call for Miss Trial. Oh, Miss Trail... Are you there?



Yes, Double, I'm here. I think I'll declare this a mistrail based on the fact that both parties but expecially the legal counsel are full of sh*t and obviously incontinent. Move as they may, nothing seems to happen, even when using the power squeezing bars .

I wasn't moved by their plea, but I must say both of them could use a slice of lemon.

Thank you Miss Trial. There you have it, two FOS members that can't seem to move. Case Dis'd.

__________________
"My clients’ wishes are the center of my attention." -- David Guido, a contractor in Woodstock, N.Y.
New York Times, July 20, 2006

Zatol

Pel... Our investigators have uncovered a disturbing close-up of painterjim. We are concerned that your client may be in grave danger and recommend placing him in protective custody. We have not yet acertained the whereabouts or condition of basicsmiley since his appearance in painterjim's initial post. There is growing speculation amongst our investigators that basicsmiley may have been on the receiving end of this photo. Please proceed with caution and protect your client at all costs.

Attached Images

PJim.bmp (50.3 KB, 35 views)

realpurty2

I object! As an amicus curiae of this court, I must call attention to several notable facts in this case. I have extensively reviewed the briefs of both parties and it's my finding that neither the prosecution nor the defense have anything substantial in their briefs! Neither have the canon of ethics in their briefs that one would hope to see there.

I ask the jurors to review the elements of this case. It is clearly a case of Vigilante Justice and malicious prosecution. It is clearly evident that PainterJim, acting pro se in this case, as referenced in this quote

feels this way because of the lack of substance in his briefs and is using the ITHA association as a distraction to cover his own actions.

On the night in question, Mr.Thumb was going about his normal routine of hanging around like-minded smiley friends, waiting to be of assistance to this large community of contractors. He was behaving like a model citizen at the time of the incident involving painterjim's supposed post.

This supposed post has yet to be produced as evidence and it's existence is therefore heavily refuted. It's purely circumstantial since it can not be produced for the court to scrutinize.

In painterjim's previous testimony, he stated

This is clearly a case of Undue Influence and Entrapment. Mr. Thumb would not have been in the vacinity of the crime if painterjim had not forced him to be there. Remember members of the jury, Mr.Thumb was with his usual group of smileys minding his own business until painterjim called him out.

Mr. Thumb's reputation has been proven with Character Evidence time and time again, represented by his many sightings on this board. Painterjim on the other hand, recently joined the community, and is further proven in this quote.

As proven by Zatol, painterjim was in fact able to post smiley's in his introductory post. This fact alone proves perjury.

Painterjim took the assumption of risk when he chose to reply to that post in question, Mr.Thumb was nothing more than an innocent bystander who became the scapegoat for painterjim's heineous crime.

Painterjim also stated in his Bill of Particulars
When in all factual evidence, the Backspace was also present at the scene of the alleged crime. Because no reply has ever been documented into evidence, the court simply can not allow it's use as evidence against Mr. Thumb. We have no proof of a victim, no weapon as evidence, and not two but with the inclusion of the backspace, three possible suspects at the scene of the incident.

Painterjim went on to say
and as you have seen documented in many instances in this case, painterjim proceeded to shoot Mr.Thumb at that time.

It's vilgilante justice! Pure vilgilante justice! Painterjim shot an innocent and respected member of our community based purely on circumstantial evidence of destruction of a post he has yet to prove even existed! There was no opportunity given to Mr. Thumb to prove this was not a capital offense worthy of punishment of death. He was never even allowed to face his accusor. Meanwhile, the backspace has never once been examined as a potential suspect. We as a community must demand the backspace's contributary negligence be explored!!

In closing, the burden of proof rests on painterjim to provide the court with this supposed reply that was removed by Mr.Thumb and undeniable evidence that it was in fact Mr.Thumb, not the backspace, who directly caused it's disappearance.

Members of the jury, I ask that you ignore the slanderous comments made by fellow members of this trial such as

There was no search warrant obtained during the discovery of this evidence and therefore, it's irrelevant to the matter at hand. I ask that you dismiss the charges against Mr.Thumb and turn your attention to the collusion between the backspace and painterjim.

__________________
Woman in a Man's World.

Tom R

It would seem that the cont.-talk (as opposed to truffle-tripe) community has ascertained said 'close-up' of painterjim, - - and have run off with their tails twixt their legs, - - rather than to hang around and be mercifully just 'hung' . . .

They muttered something about not wanting to get smilified like said smiley died of smilicide . . .

__________________
http://www.tr-built.com

Tom R

As jury foreman, - - I would request that all potential jurors (trufflers or otherwise) from the jewel-pool, - - be advised that said 'close-up' of painterjim is a 'still shot' and could very well have been taken out of context.

For instance, - - I would submit to you, - - perhaps he had just been accused of not being of a 'peaceful persuasion'.

I would have to demand upon discovery that we may inspect the 'rest of the story' from said camera(derie).

This jury of our pee-er's, - - in short, - - will not be briefed to simply convict someone on pure heresy, - - err, hearsay that is . . .

__________________
http://www.tr-built.com

Double-A

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, Your Honor, I would like to say that My Esteemed Colleague obviously has not checked her own briefs before objecting. I have it on good authority that her briefs should in no way be taken seriously. Furthermore, I also have it on good authority that her briefs are printed with a "Hello Kitty" logo on the backside.

The quote in question was not mine as is clearly shown in post #23 to this thread.

I ask that her status as a 'friend of the court" be revoked and her statements be garnished with a lemon slice, pointed and laughed at.

The quote in question was made by Miss Trial. And as far as anal retentive persons are concerned, she being the founding member of the incontinent support group, BBWM (Big Butts Without Movement), her reputation speaks for itself.

And for clarity, I would add that counsel on both sides have been paid exactly what they are worth and openly admit to being 'full of it'.

__________________
"My clients’ wishes are the center of my attention." -- David Guido, a contractor in Woodstock, N.Y.
New York Times, July 20, 2006

Debookkeeper

As someone who has been silently reviewing all the evidence, I can only say that I am appalled at the tatics being used here. The fact that neither party has anything substantial in their briefs will not persuade anyones findings one way or another. Please don't use smear tatics, and please - no belittling. I don't want to see this take the direction that both parties may possibly be suffering from big blue thumb envy.

reveivl

"the legal counsel are full of sh*t and obviously incontinent."


As a rather bemused onlooker I can only say that if one is incontinent, how can one be full of sh*t?

__________________
From where does knowledge come? If you need to know what is in a box, you could ask someone (not reliable), you could pray, (not useful), you can consult with the scripture (not helpful) or you could open the box (science)

Peladu

Zatol - Lead Detective- nice...nice, find and contribution....
realpurty2 - nice addition, I thought after that "shout out" from me, it was gonna go the other way.
Tom R - Good choice as Jury Foreman.

Double-A

I stand corrected. That's the last time I buy a legal dictionary from Wal-Mart.

__________________
"My clients’ wishes are the center of my attention." -- David Guido, a contractor in Woodstock, N.Y.
New York Times, July 20, 2006

Teetorbilt

"That's the last time I buy a legal dictionary from Wal-Mart."

This statement can be twisted in so many ways. EXCELLENT SHOT, AA!

__________________
You can't solve you're problems with the same level of thinking that created the problems.

Albert Einstein

Joewho

Is this a criminal proceeding or a civil proceeding?

Will Mr. be filing a counter claim?