Quote:
Originally Posted by L. B. Condulet
An (in house) estimator should have a salary base with bonuses or commissions based on the job coming out the way he said it would... estimators must be very trade savvy and find creative ways to save money. They should be given incentives to do well.
|
I disagree with the first part and whole heartedly agree withthe 2nd part. Think for a second if their entire income hinged on their accuracy just how creative and saavy they would become. I personally feel all people should be paid based upon performance. If you find you need to cushion this persons income to get them over the rough spots... may I suggest draws in lieu of salary? Draws are monies fronted to the employee which are later deducted from commissions they earn. In the end they make the same, it's just a little more spread out.
A salary based commission system can work and does work in many situations(as I said it is how most large commercial contractors compensate). It just doesn't work in mine!
Computer programmers are paid based on lines of code.
Data entry clerks paid based on number of files/pages entered.
Many tradesmen paid based on square/linear footages.
I tend to keep people a little longer than I should. I've fired many people in my life but in most of those cases it was well after I should have. So these people tend to cost me lots of money and lots of aggravation. When you pay based on performance I find it tends to weed out the slackers automatically since they can't earn squat because they slack. They leave on their own.