Synthetic Underlayments

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-08-2004, 07:06 AM   #1
Pro
 
jmorgan's Avatar
 
Trade: Roofing
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 174

Synthetic Underlayments


Over the last few years I have noticed increasing popularity of synthetic underlayments. Last summer’s felt price increases spurred a major increase in the use of these underlayments out here in the West. I am looking for comments, both good & bad, from anyone who has experience with these underlayments. There are 4 main brands out there. Some are white and others are black. I have heard that snow does not melt off of the white ones. Is this a problem? Are some of the black ones too slippery? Do they “stretch” when installing on hot days? What happens when they get cold? How are they priced in your areas? Having installed 2 of the 4 products, I think these underlayments are the wave of the future....what do you think?
Jim

jmorgan is offline  
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury or death. ContractorTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!

Old 12-08-2004, 08:27 AM   #2
Bah Humbug!
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Trade: Roofing and Gutter Specialist
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,574
Send a message via AIM to Grumpy

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


Jim, they still cost too much to experiment with out here in Chicago. Also I see new and improved labels slapped on the boxes just abotu every year which scares me. What was wrong with last years, or the year's before that?
Grumpy is offline  
Old 12-08-2004, 09:44 AM   #3
Pro
 
jmorgan's Avatar
 
Trade: Roofing
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 174

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


Nothing was wrong with last year's. Most mfr's are constantly trying to improve their products. For example, if the traction of the surface could be made better at no extra cost, wouldn't that be something to include in the product that is good? With GIWS the addition of embossed, hot-melt surface improved traction greatly over old GIWS. The elimination of the fold on the side of the release paper and addition of a Ripcord for split release were other improvements added over the last few years. All of these features were asked for by roofing contractors. You're right though, it seems as if everybody always has "new & improved" products all of the time. Any other comments on synthetic underlayments. Grumpy, due to your knowledge displayed on this board, your comments are especially important to me,
IMHO,
Jim
jmorgan is offline  
Old 12-10-2004, 08:59 AM   #4
Bah Humbug!
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Trade: Roofing and Gutter Specialist
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,574
Send a message via AIM to Grumpy

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


I tell my customers this, because I believe it... When something "improives" every year it isn't stable. Asphalt felt is changed little, if any, and it's tried and true. When these sytnthetic felts stablize and go a few years without dramatic changes then I will start using them

Then the sales work begins... You don't want your house to be used as a test house do you? I know I don't want to gamble with your roof.

P.S. I am not talking about improvments like rip cords. I am talking about improvements in the chemical formulas which make up the actual membrane. Rip cord improvements are features which make a product better. When you change the chemical formula of a product you are changing the whole product.
Grumpy is offline  
Old 12-10-2004, 09:01 AM   #5
Bah Humbug!
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Trade: Roofing and Gutter Specialist
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,574
Send a message via AIM to Grumpy

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


Oh Yeah P.S.S. I do use ice shields like grace, and others on a daily basis. My above comments are in regards to the synthetic FELTS... not ice blocking membranes.

Ice blocking membranes like GIWS have been on the market since the 70's and had plenty of time to work out the kinks. They are fairly stable products at their current state.
Grumpy is offline  
Old 12-10-2004, 09:46 AM   #6
Pro
 
jmorgan's Avatar
 
Trade: Roofing
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 174

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


I'm not sure, but I don't think that there have been any changes in chemical formulation since these synthetics were introduced 4-5 years ago. I believe that they are all spun-bound or woven polypropylene or polyolefen. I think most of the changes involved color or traction.
IMHO,
Jim
jmorgan is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 07:44 PM   #7
New Guy
 
warpmine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 17

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


I would only state the advantages of using the synthetics vs the organic felts is they don't expand and wrinkle up when rained on. The GAF product is pretty good for this along with price at about $25 a roll as opposed to $15 for 15 LB. Tensile strength is much better than organic and it didn't wrinkle up after days of rain so it dried out faster. Only disadvantage was that the fiberglass was all over you just like ply IV and VI BUR memebranes. Titanium UDL worked out nice but expensive($160 for ten sq). Fantastic anti-skid characterisitcs. Must be used with platic cap nails so hand nailing is a pia while a cap nailer will do wonders.
warpmine is offline  
Old 12-28-2004, 11:20 PM   #8
Bah Humbug!
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Trade: Roofing and Gutter Specialist
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,574
Send a message via AIM to Grumpy

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


As I say all the time I'd never leave just felt exposed up on a roof without shingles, or at least a tarp over it.
Grumpy is offline  
Old 12-29-2004, 07:47 AM   #9
Pro
 
jmorgan's Avatar
 
Trade: Roofing
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 174

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


Warpmine,
$160 sounds high for Titanium UDL. We get it here in the Rockies for about $110/roll (10sqs). Have found that the whitish color is a problem when dealing with snow, frost and winter roofing. The snow won't melt off.
Jim
jmorgan is offline  
Old 12-29-2004, 05:22 PM   #10
New Guy
 
warpmine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 17

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


Jim: You could be right about the pricing but then again no here really has it except ABC and they aren't giving it away. Besides the suff is manufactured in British Columbia, Canada.

We haven't seen a winter just yet as it was spring last year at the installation.

Grumpy: Thats the nice thing about the synthetics you can walk away much more securely than with rag felt.
warpmine is offline  
Old 12-30-2004, 08:14 PM   #11
Member
 
Doofus Emeritus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Peoples Republic of N. CA
Posts: 41

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


Mr. Morgan,

I have used the Titanium UDL on several projects with success, but snow does like to stick to it. One advantage is the footing is more solid than the organics, as well as tensil strength. The cost here in the peoples respooblik in N. California is competitive with organic #30, and won't blow off nearly as easy in a high wind. I also recently completed a state project using a product called Roof-Top-Guard. Another synthetic, but in black. Really slick when wet compared to the Titanium, but lays down really tight, unlike the Titanium. For those who are too proud and set in their ways to go with synthetics (and I really don't blame them), I have used Malarkey's SBS UDL on dozens of jobs. For an extra few bucks compared to #30 organic, it's a much better underlayment that won't wrinkle nearly as bad as #30.


Best regards
Doofus Emeritus is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 12:48 PM   #12
Pro
 
jmorgan's Avatar
 
Trade: Roofing
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 174

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


I've gotten some practice now. About 60 sqs TriFlex 30, 20 sqs Titanium & 10 sqs of Sharkskin. Some hand nailed and some w/cap nailers. Get to do 25 sqs of RoofTop Guard II sometime next week. Begining to develop my own opinions, but still very interested in your comments. We had another felt increase last week. If this keeps up, we all will end up having to install these products.
Jim
jmorgan is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 10:51 PM   #13
Knight of Ni!
 
metalroofer's Avatar
 
Trade: roofer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: FLA
Posts: 93

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


What do you think of tri-flex? we can't get it here in my part of FL, we do use titanium and that's all we put down now under our metal panels. I like it because it's light, won't tear and goes nicely over re-roofs as a slip sheet.

Last edited by metalroofer; 03-20-2005 at 11:13 PM.
metalroofer is offline  
Old 03-25-2005, 07:56 AM   #14
Pro
 
jmorgan's Avatar
 
Trade: Roofing
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 174

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


TriFlex is light, won't tear and also makes a great slip sheet. Out here in the Rockies, the grey color of Titanium makes it difficult to get snow & ice off prior to roofing. Can't see frost & dew on it. Triflex out here is black and does not have these problems. Also, I am a short guy and the 41" Triflex roll is easier than Titanium's 48" roll for me to install. Been snowing all week, so I haven't done my RoofTop Guard II job yet.
Jim
jmorgan is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 02:12 PM   #15
Pro
 
red_cedar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 640

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


I use some of the synthetics, I do think they are the future.
What I do see as a potential problem is ventilation plays a much bigger part. If its not done right we are talking moisture problems.
red_cedar is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 09:10 PM   #16
Pro
 
jmorgan's Avatar
 
Trade: Roofing
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 174

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


Red_Cedar,
Why do you think that synthetics have any different ventillation considerations than, say, 30# felt. I believe that the perm ratings are about the same for both, but will check the synthetic mfr's web pages for perms.
Jim
jmorgan is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 07:44 AM   #17
Pro
 
red_cedar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 640

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


Jim,
I have not checked with the manufacturers perm ratings, but will do so. The one I most have used is the Roof Top Guard series, with a litte Tri flex 30, of which I dont realy like other than the roll size.
The Roof Top Guard imformation comes from the distributor, a metal roof manufacturer. The stuff only breathes thru the seams.
I sell the underlayment with the belief that no moisture is going to get through the surface and no moisture is going out other than with conventional venting sytems.

An underlayment I have wanted to try to incorporate for some time is the 'Roofshield' About $400 a roll of apx 800 sq. ft.
the totaly breathable ( from inside to out only ) underlayment. But the industry, at this time,is going in the opposite direction with roofing underlayments.

Last edited by red_cedar; 03-31-2005 at 12:57 PM.
red_cedar is offline  
Old 04-29-2005, 01:18 PM   #18
Registered User
 
ProSpec's Avatar
 
Trade: Roofing
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


Dear Grumpy - would you buy a new computer with technology that was 2 years old? 5 yrs old? 10 years? How about one that was say... oh 50 - 100 YEARS OLD? Technology marches on - like it or not. Titanium for example has gone through 3 primary changes since it's introduction. When first introduced it had a smooth "tacky" non slip surface. Great to walk on when dry but when wet - look out. Then they came out with the non-slip "nodules" which was a great improvement under wet or dry conditions. Recently they improved the nodules spacing and formation due to roofers comments about traction when on the balls of their feet. This has also been a great improvement providing your workers with and even safer working environment. If felt is so great why doesn't it come with a warranty? The synthetics give you 15 - 20 years. Your not using their house as a test roof - your giving them added value.

Jim
ProSpec is offline  
Old 04-29-2005, 03:59 PM   #19
Pro
 
red_cedar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 640

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


Quote:
Originally Posted by ProSpec
Dear Grumpy - would you buy a new computer with technology that was 2 years old? 5 yrs old? 10 years? How about one that was say... oh 50 - 100 YEARS OLD? Technology marches on - like it or not. Titanium for example has gone through 3 primary changes since it's introduction. When first introduced it had a smooth "tacky" non slip surface. Great to walk on when dry but when wet - look out. Then they came out with the non-slip "nodules" which was a great improvement under wet or dry conditions. Recently they improved the nodules spacing and formation due to roofers comments about traction when on the balls of their feet. This has also been a great improvement providing your workers with and even safer working environment. If felt is so great why doesn't it come with a warranty? The synthetics give you 15 - 20 years. Your not using their house as a test roof - your giving them added value.

Jim

What are you doing on the computer Jim, you should be out selling some "ATAS" metal roofing
red_cedar is offline  
Old 04-29-2005, 05:25 PM   #20
Bah Humbug!
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Trade: Roofing and Gutter Specialist
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,574
Send a message via AIM to Grumpy

Re: Synthetic Underlayments


Would I buy a computer with 50 year old technology? Yes if it served a purpose and I was confident it did what I needed it to do. Would I sell my customer a 50 year old computer? Only if I was confident it was the best solution for their problem.

Why don't I sell the synthetics? You said it yourself. In the short time Titanium has been on the market it has been changed 3 times. Hmmm... to me that equals instability. Yes it's getting that "new and improved" sticker slapped on every box, which makes some happy; but it makes me cautious.

I have looked into quite a few different synthetics and I am even thinking of trying out a few, but my customers will not be the guinea pigs of any products because I am not going to slap my name or company name & reputation on a "maybe".
Grumpy is offline  


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tried the Typar synthetic underlayment-nice! IHI Roofing 6 09-16-2006 12:14 PM
Synthetic Hydraulic Oil? denick Excavation & Site Work 3 09-05-2006 03:59 PM
another synthetic underlayment question shopman Roofing 7 08-29-2006 08:57 AM
Best Synthetic Roofing Underlayments larry.doss@prod Roofing 2 11-04-2005 10:34 AM
Is there a consensus about shingles? PipeGuy Roofing 41 12-29-2004 12:49 AM

Join Now... It's Fast and FREE!

Privacy Badge
I am a professional contractor
I am a DIY Homeowner
ContractorTalk.com is for
PROFESSIONAL CONTRACTORS ONLY!

At ContractorTalk.com we cater exlusivly to professional contractors who make their living as a contractor. Knowing that many homeowners and DIYers are looking for a community to call home, we've created www.DIYChatroom.com DIY Chatroom is full of helpful advices and perfect for DIY homeowners.

Redirecing in 10 seconds
No Thanks
terms of service

Already Have an Account?