I'm Looking For Bond, Construction Bond

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-16-2009, 10:40 PM   #1
Member
 
constructonomics's Avatar
 
Trade: Construction Management
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Newtown, PA
Posts: 81

I'm Looking For Bond, Construction Bond


In the eyes of an owner of a construction project a payment and performance bond is like that warm and fuzzy security blanket that takes all their troubles away. Bonding is one of those construction issues that I never fully understood. And I guess I still don't, but my knowledge probably quadrupled when I actually tried to obtain one for myself.

We've all heard of the requirement for contractors to be bonded and insured and this is especially the case when public entities are using a low bid method of selecting contractors. But really, what are they?

Surety bonds provide financial security and construction assurance by assuring owners that contractors will perform the work and pay subcontractors, laborers, and material suppliers. It's basically a risk transfer mechanism where the surety company assures the project owner that the contractor will perform a contract in accordance with the contract documents. If the contractor defaults or goes bankrupt, the bonding company comes in and finishes the job on their dime.

Bonds are actually a lot older than I thought. I read an article about the first known bond to have been etched in a clay tablet from the Mesopotamian region around 2750 BC. According to the contract, a farmer drafted into the service of the king who was unable to tend his fields. The farmer contracted with another farmer to tend them under the condition they split the proceeds equally. A local merchant served as the surety and guaranteed the second farmer’s compliance - a brave man.

However, even in 2750 BC Mesopotamia, payment and performance bonds were tougher to find than an exploding money clip, and without a code name like 007, it's still tough to get one. I was in hot pursuit (sans Alpha Romeo) of a payment and performance bond this week while putting together a bid for a public repair project. After days of discussions and filling out forms of financials, I was told about two hours before bid time that I would have to put 30% of the contract value up as collateral in order to get a bond. Thanks for the notice.

Just like a municipality doesn't want to take a risk on an unproven contractor, a surety is similarly cautious. This kind of leads me to wonder what good they are anyway; they won't bond you unless the risk of you defaulting is next to zero to begin with. The owner could just as easily write joint checks or contract directly with the sub (who are also bonded by the way) and hire the general contractor as a consulting construction manager.

In private projects however, this is how most work is done. In an effort to avoid doubling up on security (and wasting money), the subs are bonded and the general contract either goes unbonded or acts as a consulting manager. This is the more practical and cost effective way to do it, but when tax payer dollars are on the line, I suppose logic, practicality, and certainly cost effectiveness are all thrown into a BMW Z8 and shredded by a helicopter.

So without a bond my bid was forced to spontaneously self destruct (no, that's Mission Impossible) and I'm back to the drawing, err bidding board, and another trip to the Casino Royale of public works request for proposals.


Last edited by KentWhitten; 09-23-2009 at 08:45 PM. Reason: removed links
constructonomics is offline  
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury or death. ContractorTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!

Old 09-16-2009, 10:49 PM   #2
solar guy
 
naptown CR's Avatar
 
Trade: solar contracting
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Annapolis Md
Posts: 1,883

Re: I'm Looking For Bond, Construction Bond


Quote:
Originally Posted by constrctonomics View Post


In the eyes of an owner of a construction project a payment and performance bond is like that warm and fuzzy security blanket that takes all their troubles away. Bonding is one of those construction issues that I never fully understood. And I guess I still don't, but my knowledge probably quadrupled when I actually tried to obtain one for myself.

We've all heard of the requirement for contractors to be bonded and insured and this is especially the case when public entities are using a low bid method of selecting contractors. But really, what are they?

Surety bonds provide financial security and construction assurance by assuring owners that contractors will perform the work and pay subcontractors, laborers, and material suppliers. It's basically a risk transfer mechanism where the surety company assures the project owner that the contractor will perform a contract in accordance with the contract documents. If the contractor defaults or goes bankrupt, the bonding company comes in and finishes the job on their dime.

Bonds are actually a lot older than I thought. I read an article about the first known bond to have been etched in a clay tablet from the Mesopotamian region around 2750 BC. According to the contract, a farmer drafted into the service of the king who was unable to tend his fields. The farmer contracted with another farmer to tend them under the condition they split the proceeds equally. A local merchant served as the surety and guaranteed the second farmer’s compliance - a brave man.

However, even in 2750 BC Mesopotamia, payment and performance bonds were tougher to find than an exploding money clip, and without a code name like 007, it's still tough to get one. I was in hot pursuit (sans Alpha Romeo) of a payment and performance bond this week while putting together a bid for a public repair project. After days of discussions and filling out forms of financials, I was told about two hours before bid time that I would have to put 30% of the contract value up as collateral in order to get a bond. Thanks for the notice.

Just like a municipality doesn't want to take a risk on an unproven contractor, a surety is similarly cautious. This kind of leads me to wonder what good they are anyway; they won't bond you unless the risk of you defaulting is next to zero to begin with. The owner could just as easily write joint checks or contract directly with the sub (who are also bonded by the way) and hire the general contractor as a consulting construction manager.

In private projects however, this is how most work is done. In an effort to avoid doubling up on security (and wasting money), the subs are bonded and the general contract either goes unbonded or acts as a consulting manager. This is the more practical and cost effective way to do it, but when tax payer dollars are on the line, I suppose logic, practicality, and certainly cost effectiveness are all thrown into a BMW Z8 and shredded by a helicopter.

So without a bond my bid was forced to spontaneously self destruct (no, that's Mission Impossible) and I'm back to the drawing, err bidding board, and another trip to the Casino Royale of public works request for proposals.
Start smaller especially with the feds. projects under 25K typically are not bonded. Establish a track record and then go after bigger projects. If you are married( give her 51% if you trust her to get MWBE status) or a veteran and better yet a disabled vet( all vietnam era vets are considered as presumed disabled )there are programs for you.

Last edited by KentWhitten; 09-23-2009 at 08:46 PM. Reason: removed links
naptown CR is offline  
Old 09-16-2009, 11:21 PM   #3
dirtydawg
 
App-ironworks's Avatar
 
Trade: Metal Fabricating/Welding/Ornamental Metal
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Marshall, NC
Posts: 376

Re: I'm Looking For Bond, Construction Bond


Quote:
Originally Posted by constrctonomics View Post
Please comment on the following article from Constructionomics. Thank you.


In the eyes of an owner of a construction project a payment and performance bond is like that warm and fuzzy security blanket that takes all their troubles away. Bonding is one of those construction issues that I never fully understood. And I guess I still don't, but my knowledge probably quadrupled when I actually tried to obtain one for myself.

We've all heard of the requirement for contractors to be bonded and insured and this is especially the case when public entities are using a low bid method of selecting contractors. But really, what are they?

Surety bonds provide financial security and construction assurance by assuring owners that contractors will perform the work and pay subcontractors, laborers, and material suppliers. It's basically a risk transfer mechanism where the surety company assures the project owner that the contractor will perform a contract in accordance with the contract documents. If the contractor defaults or goes bankrupt, the bonding company comes in and finishes the job on their dime.

Bonds are actually a lot older than I thought. I read an article about the first known bond to have been etched in a clay tablet from the Mesopotamian region around 2750 BC. According to the contract, a farmer drafted into the service of the king who was unable to tend his fields. The farmer contracted with another farmer to tend them under the condition they split the proceeds equally. A local merchant served as the surety and guaranteed the second farmer’s compliance - a brave man.

However, even in 2750 BC Mesopotamia, payment and performance bonds were tougher to find than an exploding money clip, and without a code name like 007, it's still tough to get one. I was in hot pursuit (sans Alpha Romeo) of a payment and performance bond this week while putting together a bid for a public repair project. After days of discussions and filling out forms of financials, I was told about two hours before bid time that I would have to put 30% of the contract value up as collateral in order to get a bond. Thanks for the notice.

Just like a municipality doesn't want to take a risk on an unproven contractor, a surety is similarly cautious. This kind of leads me to wonder what good they are anyway; they won't bond you unless the risk of you defaulting is next to zero to begin with. The owner could just as easily write joint checks or contract directly with the sub (who are also bonded by the way) and hire the general contractor as a consulting construction manager.

In private projects however, this is how most work is done. In an effort to avoid doubling up on security (and wasting money), the subs are bonded and the general contract either goes unbonded or acts as a consulting manager. This is the more practical and cost effective way to do it, but when tax payer dollars are on the line, I suppose logic, practicality, and certainly cost effectiveness are all thrown into a BMW Z8 and shredded by a helicopter.

So without a bond my bid was forced to spontaneously self destruct (no, that's Mission Impossible) and I'm back to the drawing, err bidding board, and another trip to the Casino Royale of public works request for proposals.
The other Bond. James Bond drove an Aston Martin. Heaven forbid the limey bloke be caught in an Italian car.
App-ironworks is offline  
Old 09-16-2009, 11:44 PM   #4
General Contractor
 
Willie T's Avatar
 
Trade: General Contractor
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: St. Petersburg, FL Minds of moderate caliber ordinarily condemn everything which is beyond their range.
Posts: 2,653

Re: I'm Looking For Bond, Construction Bond


It's kind of like a loan. You can't be approved unless you can prove you don't need one.
__________________
"True eloquence consists in saying all that is necessary, and only that which is."
François Duc de La Rochefoucauld
Bill Everett - St. Petersburg, FL
Willie T is offline  
Old 09-17-2009, 09:24 AM   #5
Member
 
constructonomics's Avatar
 
Trade: Construction Management
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Newtown, PA
Posts: 81

Re: I'm Looking For Bond, Construction Bond


The problem is that I'm not married, I'm not a veteran, and I'm a white male.

I might as well forget about any advantages. It ain't easy.
constructonomics is offline  


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Top 10 Construction Lien Errors Ed the Roofer Business 7 08-19-2011 11:51 AM
I want to get in Construction and am looking for advice chompchomp12 Business 21 12-17-2009 10:39 PM
Is this the future of construction in America? HusqyPro General Discussion 10 09-12-2009 08:21 PM
CCD - and construction image Mike Finley General Discussion 6 08-31-2007 09:37 AM

Join Now... It's Fast and FREE!

Privacy Badge
I am a professional contractor
I am a DIY Homeowner
ContractorTalk.com is for
PROFESSIONAL CONTRACTORS ONLY!

At ContractorTalk.com we cater exlusivly to professional contractors who make their living as a contractor. Knowing that many homeowners and DIYers are looking for a community to call home, we've created www.DIYChatroom.com DIY Chatroom is full of helpful advices and perfect for DIY homeowners.

Redirecing in 10 seconds
No Thanks
terms of service

Already Have an Account?