Happy Thanksgiving all!
Thanks for the comments so far.
Trimguy -
Quote:
|
> if the flooring is nailed to the subfloor it is not a "floating floor".
|
Sorry. Wasn't clear here. I meant to say that I can see how, as opposed to a nailed down floor, something like a floating floor could expand. Wasn't suggesting that nailing down hardwood made it floating.
kneel_eh! -
Good idea about using spray foam with holes. Trimguy suggested insulating there, and the hole cutting idea seems a bit quicker.
Donedat -
Manufacturer's sheet says paper, allowing it to breath. But hear enough conflicting info that... well, that's why I'm here asking.

Didn't know if there are other concerns above and beyond what the manuf. recommends.
Justin Savage -
I checked the Floor Muffler. Sounds like a good idea, but it is a moisture barrier.
From their FAQ:
Quote:
In fact, both the laminate and the solid wood flooring associations state that generally, flooring may be installed provided that the moisture vapor transmission rate is below 3 lbs. / 1000 sq. ft. per 24 hours.
FloorMuffler™ allows only 1.39 lbs. / 1000 sq. ft. per 24 hours. In essence, it performs over 215% better than what is required for most installations.
|
So I guess it is not a good idea.
All --
(correct me here if my summary is off base or missing something)
Underlayment, Moisture
A moisture barrier does two things: Keep moisture out, and keep moisture in. From your comments, it seems the value of keeping mositure out (on the second floor) isn't as import as NOT keeping the moisture in (letting it breath).
I'm going to venture a guess that the recommendations I got (before posting here) for a barrier are from people that mainly have experience with/thinking only of installing on concrete (with plywood overlay), where is it more important to keep moisture from reaching the floor from the concrete, than to let the moisture in the floor out. So it just boils down to which side of the barrier will have a higher moisture content?
Underlayment, Soundproofing
Consensus seems to be between the joists is the only option for hardwood.
I note that some high rises require soundproofing, and that natural cork is used as it allows the wood to breath. Anyone used cork? Curious here...
Expansion
I will go ahead and do the 1/2" regardless, but was curious as there was such a difference in opinion. (kneel-eh! - will remember undercut door jambs. thanks!)
The "don't anchor the first row" issue
(and just to be clear, not to question all of your sage advice, but I'm trying to wrap my head around all of this )
It occurs to me that the staple/nail/whatever at a 50% angle in every board to either side of a given board either fights expansion or allows it.
Going back against the staples to the first row, it would seem to me that the resistance provided by the staple (it would either have to be driven down more or be bent backward, and then multiply that by every single other staple between the board in question and the first row) would be much greater than the single anchor nail in the first row.
So, as the wood expands, the path of least resistance for the entire floor is AWAY from the first board to the other wall.
Maybe a diagram might help.
(EDIT: nope. doesn't help at all. The web page takes all of my spaces out between the lines. Anyone know how to make it so more than one space doesn't get compressed down to one space? If someone can tell me, I'll come back and add them later. Well, I hope the idea gets across without the diagram.]
|  / / / /
| / / / /
| / / / /
----------------------------------------------------------------- Subfloor
Nail/ Staple Staple Staple Staple
Screw
<------ Force this Direction pushes against the staple
and down into subfloor.
THUS, the combined force of expansion plus
the guide of the metal run through floor
and subfloor at a 50% angle results in movement
this direction
/
/
|/_
Path of least resistance
-------> Force this Direction pushes WITH the staple
and up AWAY from the subfloor.
THUS, the combined force of expansion plus
the guide of the metal run through floor
and subfloor at a 50% angle results in movement
this direction _
/|
/
/
So, does this not mean that
A) one should allow for more expansion on the tailing end?
and
B) does this not eventually push the floor away from the subfloor and pull out the fasteners on this end? (as it is easier to pull out the fastener than it is to bend it)
Or am I just entirely over-thinking this?
(I do have a tendency to do that and am working on too little sleep as is... reminds me I have a turkey to check on...)
Thanks for your comments!