Quote:
Originally Posted by PrecisionFloors
Are you a certified independant floor covering inspector? If not I highly suggest your client find one asap. If you have no documentation showing your supposed expertise, whats to stop a judge from asking why your opinion should be trusted over the other shops? I'm not saying you don't have the ability but just trying to play devil's advocate....which you really should do on matters like this.
http://www.nicfi.org/
|
That's what I was thinking but this isn't complicated. The Expanko directions are right there on the website. I'm not giving uncoraborated expert information here, it's verbatim what's said in the Expanko literature and if I had to testify, I'd just tell them I follow those directions when I install Expanko glue down. Anyone can see once the tiles come up whether there is Ardex on the plywood seams or not. You don't even need to be a flooring guy to know that. It would be nice if Expanko would come out and say it but well let's just say they don't want to lose this flooring company as one of their distributors.
This flooring company not only didn't prep the plywood, they used round nails, didn't apply feather finish to smooth out the seams; they didn't even put any coats of finish which Expanko explicitly states is required on all commercial installations of the product.
But I guess the company won't let it go. They still insist the salon owner pay the $19,000 and insist it's a minor fix. And like many of you, most contractors don't want to get involved so the attorney is standing there trying to figure out if the company is faking the jargon or being real. Kind of sad. I feel for both of them. The company is reputable otherwise but is also known for using union workers, so I suspect they aren't able to pass it on to a sub unless they would have by now.